Comments on: Waiver Wire Update

By: sincekindergarten

sincekindergarten — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:26:10 +0000

According to both MetsBlog and MLB Trade Rumors, Glendon Rusch wants back into baseball. I’d be willing to sign him to a contract for N’awlins and see how he does down there. Invite him to ST.

By: skibolton

skibolton — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:02:34 +0000

The elias rankings came out today I guess, but I can’t find a complete list. None of the rockies would cost a team to lose a pick, and barrett is the only padre that would cost one. I can’t find anything on the mets free agents yet, but I will as soon as possible.

By: isuzudude

isuzudude — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:50:51 +0000

I agree with your final paragraph, skibo…although I’m more of a Silva guy than Livan. Something about Silva is more trustworthy than Riske, and I think starting pitching should always be paramount to relief pitching. That’s not to say relief pitching should be ignored, but if it came down to signing Silva or Riske, I’d pick Silva.

By: skibolton

skibolton — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:36:12 +0000

I like riske and think he would be as safe a bet as anybody. He’s fairly consistant year to year, never really had big injury issues, and has been pitching in the american league. It seems like he would be a fairly safe bet as an option. I think my biggest concern with relievers at this point is wondering how many of their good season might have been tied to performance enhancers. It seems like a lot of these guys are being implicated lately, more relievers than everyone else combined. The last several years seem to have brought about quite a fluctuation in reliever performance, probably a direct result of the drug testing. I just don’t like the idea of signing any reliever to a long term deal now. Too many of them seem to be breaking down from the workload they are given without anything to help them recover. I’d be all for going after a guy like cordero or mo, but I just worry about guys who broke in as relievers when there was no drug testing. I’m curious to see who gets named in the mitchell report. I’d really love it to come out prior to the start of free agency. If we can give riske more money to take a one year deal with options, I’m all for it. I don’t want to see us take on a reliever for 3 years unless he is just lights out. It just seems like the teams giving out those contracts get burned more often than not.
The more I look at it, the more I like the idea of going after livan as a fifth starter. The guy will at least give the bullpen a day off every fifth day. I also think he’d benefit more than most by moving to shea. Carlos Silva is looking better and better as well. I think these two guys would do more for our bullpen than a guy like riske.

By: Micalpalyn

Micalpalyn — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:47:38 +0000

http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news;_ylt=AtMtperzqlwQrjxDt5ZzoWQ5nYcB?slug=jp-arod103007&prov=yhoo&type=lgn

Why did I post that link?….Bottom line the Mets can afford a mistake and beeter yet dump either Sho or Mota.

Riske is very much worth his $$$ and risk at a $$$ amount in the Sho range (+20%?). The only real weght is what compensation is involved.

By: joe

joe — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:22:14 +0000

The only “risk” with him is that he gets a 3-year deal — no ifs, ands, or buts. And knowing the volatility of middle relievers, the team has to be OK with the possibility of eating at least the last year, or two years, of that deal.

How lucky are we that Guillermo Mota was signed to “only” a 2-year deal? And the Mets may not be so quick to eat his second year … partially because they’re also stuck with The Show for two more years.

I liked Riske last winter, and still like him. But this year, I don’t like the market.

But, as long as it’s the Wilpons’ money, I say get him.

By: isuzudude

isuzudude — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:08:24 +0000

Good looking out, Mic. I was under the impression Riske only had a team option attached to his contract, which the Royals would have been silly not to pick up. However, now that Riske is available on the open market, you can bet your butt a lot of teams will be seeking his services. He looks like a very good reliever from all indications. He’s a workhorse, with 69 2/3 innings or more pitched in 4 of last 5 seasons. Less than a hit per inning pitched in each of last 7 seasons. Relatively low WHIP & ERA. Opponents batting averages are low with runners on base. He’s also equally effective against lefties and righties (he’s a RHP). If the Mets were to sign him, you would figure he’d be in line for additional success switching leagues for the first time in his career. All signs point to this guy being a fantastic pick-up for any team. I’d particularly like to hear from skibolton on this issue, who has been adament about not picking up any free agent relief pitching. Is Riske worth the risk? Sorry, I had to use that line. But really, I know the Mets have been burnt with recent long term contracts to relief pitchers (Mota, Schoeneweis), but isn’t Riske deserving? 3 years, $12-mil? Who among us would sign on the dotted line?

By: Micalpalyn

Micalpalyn — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:41:15 +0000

From MLBrumors….’David Riske had a $2.9MM player option. He declined it given his stellar 2.45 ERA in 69.2 innings this year. He’ll get a nice Bob Howry/Jamie Walker type of deal for three years”

By: joe

joe — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 00:43:38 +0000

Thanks for the update.

Hmm … that leaves LoDuca, Barrett, Kendall, and Torrealba. And there’s buzz that the Mets are interested in Torrealba. Ugh.

By: isuzudude

isuzudude — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 00:28:32 +0000

In case anyone is keeping track, Houston resigned Brad Ausmus today. Another catcher off the list (although Ausmus wouldn’t have been anything better than a backup for the Mets).

By: isuzudude

isuzudude — Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:10:47 +0000

David Wright will be on the Daily Show on Wednesday night…perhaps dropping nuggets on his feelings towards acquiring Arod?