<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Found a Match!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.metstoday.com/2008-2009-offseason/2008/found-a-match/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.metstoday.com/2008-2009-offseason/2008/found-a-match/</link>
	<description>New York Mets news, game recaps, opinion, and analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: RockStar78</title>
		<link>http://www.metstoday.com/2008-2009-offseason/2008/found-a-match/#comment-12805</link>
		<dc:creator>RockStar78</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 13:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metstoday.com/?p=2275#comment-12805</guid>
		<description>I never liked the Schoeneweis signing to begin with (career 5.01 ERA coming in), and in 2007, he was flat out horrible.  This year, as Joe pointed out, the ERA was good, but he never got the big outs when the team needed him.  That ERA was compiled by pitching a lot of mop up innings, and in innings when he got 3 outs, but let 3 inherited runners to score.  Figure if he came in to a game with the bases loaded and nobody out and gave up a bases clearing double, and then retired the next three, his ERA is 0.00 for that inning.  I hope Omar can work out a trade for him this offseason.  As for his personal life, hope everything works out and I am not blaming him for game 162, just his entire tenure as a Met overall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never liked the Schoeneweis signing to begin with (career 5.01 ERA coming in), and in 2007, he was flat out horrible.  This year, as Joe pointed out, the ERA was good, but he never got the big outs when the team needed him.  That ERA was compiled by pitching a lot of mop up innings, and in innings when he got 3 outs, but let 3 inherited runners to score.  Figure if he came in to a game with the bases loaded and nobody out and gave up a bases clearing double, and then retired the next three, his ERA is 0.00 for that inning.  I hope Omar can work out a trade for him this offseason.  As for his personal life, hope everything works out and I am not blaming him for game 162, just his entire tenure as a Met overall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.metstoday.com/2008-2009-offseason/2008/found-a-match/#comment-12804</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 03:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metstoday.com/?p=2275#comment-12804</guid>
		<description>SK, I would have to agree with your assessment re: Scho's issues at home. As fans we'd like to believe that pro ballplayers are superhuman, and can somehow completely disassociate themselves from their lives off the field. 

To borrow a quote from one of my old semipro coaches, who was trying to play down opponents who had recently played MLB: "he puts his pants on one leg at a time, just like you". In other words, it doesn't matter if you make millions of dollars a year, and play baseball in front of 50 million TV viewers -- you're still human, and affected by the same things as an "average joe". 

That said, I'd have to believe that Scott's newborn had to be somewhere on his mind, and I'm not going to fault him if it was. 

Now, as for April to August, I don't have an excuse for him. Whereas Scho's ERA was sparkling most of the year, it was pointed out many times here that he was atrocious when it came to inherited runners. Was that his fault, or the fault of the manager who continually put him (and other relievers) into these situations?

I still stand by my theory that this bullpen was completely mismanaged, and the fact that the personnel is getting the blame is at least partly erroneous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SK, I would have to agree with your assessment re: Scho&#8217;s issues at home. As fans we&#8217;d like to believe that pro ballplayers are superhuman, and can somehow completely disassociate themselves from their lives off the field. </p>
<p>To borrow a quote from one of my old semipro coaches, who was trying to play down opponents who had recently played MLB: &#8220;he puts his pants on one leg at a time, just like you&#8221;. In other words, it doesn&#8217;t matter if you make millions of dollars a year, and play baseball in front of 50 million TV viewers &#8212; you&#8217;re still human, and affected by the same things as an &#8220;average joe&#8221;. </p>
<p>That said, I&#8217;d have to believe that Scott&#8217;s newborn had to be somewhere on his mind, and I&#8217;m not going to fault him if it was. </p>
<p>Now, as for April to August, I don&#8217;t have an excuse for him. Whereas Scho&#8217;s ERA was sparkling most of the year, it was pointed out many times here that he was atrocious when it came to inherited runners. Was that his fault, or the fault of the manager who continually put him (and other relievers) into these situations?</p>
<p>I still stand by my theory that this bullpen was completely mismanaged, and the fact that the personnel is getting the blame is at least partly erroneous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sincekindergarten</title>
		<link>http://www.metstoday.com/2008-2009-offseason/2008/found-a-match/#comment-12803</link>
		<dc:creator>sincekindergarten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 21:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metstoday.com/?p=2275#comment-12803</guid>
		<description>The only word in the last line that was supposed to be in italics was "anyone."  :o  Sorry!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only word in the last line that was supposed to be in italics was &#8220;anyone.&#8221;  <img src='http://www.metstoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':o' class='wp-smiley' />  Sorry!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sincekindergarten</title>
		<link>http://www.metstoday.com/2008-2009-offseason/2008/found-a-match/#comment-12802</link>
		<dc:creator>sincekindergarten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 21:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metstoday.com/?p=2275#comment-12802</guid>
		<description>RockStar, I'd be a tad hesitant (sp?) to blame Schoeneweis for the bullpen mess.  Let's remember something--he was actually being &lt;i&gt;cheered&lt;/i&gt; at Shea this year, after coming in and getting the job done.  I actually saw one of the instances on SNY.  (I thought it was a Sign of the End Times, too.)

It's also been established, as fact, that Schoe's fourth child was born prematurely sometime near the end of the season, and said preemie child was still in a neonatal ICU when the season ended.  (BTW, how is the child now?)  I can only speak for myself here, but if it was &lt;i&gt;my&lt;/i&gt; child in that N-NICU, I'd be pretty expletive-deleted useless to &lt;i&gt;anyone,&lt;i&gt; much less my boss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RockStar, I&#8217;d be a tad hesitant (sp?) to blame Schoeneweis for the bullpen mess.  Let&#8217;s remember something&#8211;he was actually being <i>cheered</i> at Shea this year, after coming in and getting the job done.  I actually saw one of the instances on SNY.  (I thought it was a Sign of the End Times, too.)</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also been established, as fact, that Schoe&#8217;s fourth child was born prematurely sometime near the end of the season, and said preemie child was still in a neonatal ICU when the season ended.  (BTW, how is the child now?)  I can only speak for myself here, but if it was <i>my</i> child in that N-NICU, I&#8217;d be pretty expletive-deleted useless to <i>anyone,</i><i> much less my boss.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.metstoday.com/2008-2009-offseason/2008/found-a-match/#comment-12801</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 20:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metstoday.com/?p=2275#comment-12801</guid>
		<description>RockStar, you're right ... I stand corrected. The Rays have ChadBrad for 2009 at $3.5M. Sounds like a bargain, doesn't it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RockStar, you&#8217;re right &#8230; I stand corrected. The Rays have ChadBrad for 2009 at $3.5M. Sounds like a bargain, doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RockStar78</title>
		<link>http://www.metstoday.com/2008-2009-offseason/2008/found-a-match/#comment-12800</link>
		<dc:creator>RockStar78</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 19:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metstoday.com/?p=2275#comment-12800</guid>
		<description>Isn't Bradford a free agent after next season?  I seem to remember him and Schoeneweis getting near identical contracts.  

Either way, hopefully Omar realizes that Schoeneweis can better help this team by selling pretzels and ice cream during the games instead of actually participating in them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t Bradford a free agent after next season?  I seem to remember him and Schoeneweis getting near identical contracts.  </p>
<p>Either way, hopefully Omar realizes that Schoeneweis can better help this team by selling pretzels and ice cream during the games instead of actually participating in them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.metstoday.com/2008-2009-offseason/2008/found-a-match/#comment-12798</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metstoday.com/?p=2275#comment-12798</guid>
		<description>RockStar, you're right about ChadBrad re: the waiver thing. But if he was waived a week after the deadline, then the O's must have had him available at and before the deadline. The fact he slipped all the way to the Rays, who I believe were last in the waiver rank at the time, says there wasn't much interest in him -- so his trade price was likely low. 

I have a sneaking suspicion that someone in the Mets' hierarchy was too proud to bring back Bradford, because it would be like admitting they made a mistake in letting him get away. 

Proof in the pudding will come this winter: Bradford is a FA, and there's no way anyone can tell me he wouldn't be helpful to the 2009 bullpen. 

From the rumors I heard, F-Mart would not have been necessary for the Mets to pick up the few extra parts they needed. The holdups supposedly were on Niese, Parnell, Evans, Murphy, Kunz.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RockStar, you&#8217;re right about ChadBrad re: the waiver thing. But if he was waived a week after the deadline, then the O&#8217;s must have had him available at and before the deadline. The fact he slipped all the way to the Rays, who I believe were last in the waiver rank at the time, says there wasn&#8217;t much interest in him &#8212; so his trade price was likely low. </p>
<p>I have a sneaking suspicion that someone in the Mets&#8217; hierarchy was too proud to bring back Bradford, because it would be like admitting they made a mistake in letting him get away. </p>
<p>Proof in the pudding will come this winter: Bradford is a FA, and there&#8217;s no way anyone can tell me he wouldn&#8217;t be helpful to the 2009 bullpen. </p>
<p>From the rumors I heard, F-Mart would not have been necessary for the Mets to pick up the few extra parts they needed. The holdups supposedly were on Niese, Parnell, Evans, Murphy, Kunz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RockStar78</title>
		<link>http://www.metstoday.com/2008-2009-offseason/2008/found-a-match/#comment-12796</link>
		<dc:creator>RockStar78</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 12:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metstoday.com/?p=2275#comment-12796</guid>
		<description>Joe, in regards to Chad Bradford, I think American League teams had a shot at him first, so the Mets didn't get a chance.  If no AL team claimed him, then he would have fell to the NL.  But there was no way a quality reliever like that would go unclaimed.  As for Manny and Bay, you're right, Omar could've pulled the trigger, but he is in love with his prospects, particularly Fernando Martinez.  This kid better turn out to be the real deal and not another Alex Escobar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe, in regards to Chad Bradford, I think American League teams had a shot at him first, so the Mets didn&#8217;t get a chance.  If no AL team claimed him, then he would have fell to the NL.  But there was no way a quality reliever like that would go unclaimed.  As for Manny and Bay, you&#8217;re right, Omar could&#8217;ve pulled the trigger, but he is in love with his prospects, particularly Fernando Martinez.  This kid better turn out to be the real deal and not another Alex Escobar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.metstoday.com/2008-2009-offseason/2008/found-a-match/#comment-12792</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 19:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metstoday.com/?p=2275#comment-12792</guid>
		<description>Hmmm ... nobody wanted to "rent" Manny for two months and then "let him walk away in the winter". There were also people saying that Manny would be a "cancer in the clubhouse". And the crazy thing is, the Mets could've had him (or Bay) for nothing. 

By the way, anyone else find it funny that Omar "couldn't find a match" when Chad Bradford was traded for nobody? ChadBrad was acquired for a player to be named later -- you mean the Mets had NO ONE who fit that description?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm &#8230; nobody wanted to &#8220;rent&#8221; Manny for two months and then &#8220;let him walk away in the winter&#8221;. There were also people saying that Manny would be a &#8220;cancer in the clubhouse&#8221;. And the crazy thing is, the Mets could&#8217;ve had him (or Bay) for nothing. </p>
<p>By the way, anyone else find it funny that Omar &#8220;couldn&#8217;t find a match&#8221; when Chad Bradford was traded for nobody? ChadBrad was acquired for a player to be named later &#8212; you mean the Mets had NO ONE who fit that description?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Vazzano</title>
		<link>http://www.metstoday.com/2008-2009-offseason/2008/found-a-match/#comment-12786</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Vazzano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metstoday.com/?p=2275#comment-12786</guid>
		<description>As long as that "deal" is Manny Ramirez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as that &#8220;deal&#8221; is Manny Ramirez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
