Mets Sniffing Around Young, Bush
Get your mind out of the gutter.
Not sure how you interpreted that headline, but I read at MetsBlog that the Mets are interested in pitchers Chris Young and David Bush.
You already know my stance on Young; despite his intelligence and degree from Princeton, I’m not convinced that a) he’ll be healthy; and b) if healthy, he’ll be all that great. I have also mentioned Bush before, suggesting that he’s unspectacular but is healthy, cheap, takes the ball every five days, and would likely keep D.J. Carrasco in the bullpen and Tobi Stoner in AAA — both of which are good things.
Although both of these hurlers have been discussed here before, this is the first time MetsToday has put Young / Bush on display in the same post. That said, I’m curious to hear your thoughts: do you like Young / Bush? Why or why not?
Considering the other internet page I have open right now, I cannot hide my interest in Young/Bush.
Neither candidate is particularly inspiring but I don’t see the upside potential in Young that warrants the injury risk over the more steadily available Bush for the back of the rotation especially when the Mets have such little rotation depth to begin with.
didn’t he get divorced or something during the NLCS’s which is why he sucked in his last game as a met? gotta cut that guy some slack. he brought more positives than negatives to the mets.
i think we shouldn’t get our hopes up over minor signings…and maybe hope for some possible trades…boy i wish teams made more trades
Plus, if it’s cheap and easy to acquire, Sandy Alderson is all over it! Moneyball, right?
Yeesh! I’d never be allowed to work in the front office with errors like that. Or do they speak in binary?
Or, if you want the Fantasy Front Office to understand your statement:
00100101001110001010010000010101010100010010110