2010 Analysis: Pat Misch

It was deja vu all over again for the Poor Man’s Tom Glavine.

At the tail end of 2009, with the Mets’ pitching staff ravaged by injuries, Misch came up from AAA to admirably fill in a spot at the back end of the rotation – including tossing a complete-game shutout in Game 156.

His strong work down the stretch wasn’t enough to earn him a rotation spot in 2010, however – not with future All-Stars such as John Maine and Oliver Perez on the roster – and so it was back to Buffalo for the soft-tossing lefty.

Fast-forward to September 2010, and once again Pat Misch was promoted to make spot starts in a rotation that was beset by injuries. While Misch didn’t pitch quite as well as he did 12 months previous – nor as regularly – he did pitch about as well as one could expect from a back-end starter.

Misch started 6 games in 2010, going 0-4 with a 4.28 ERA and 1.28 WHIP, striking out 21 and walking only 4 in 33 innings. His best outing came against the Nationals in Game 160, when he allowed 3 hits and one run in 8 innings, striking out 10 in a no-decision. He’s not the most exciting or dominating pitcher, and he doesn’t miss a lot of bats, but he does throw a ton of strikes – his strategy is the currently unfashionable “pitch to contact” (which worked well for a few starters up in Minnesota).

As he did in 2009, manager Jerry Manuel felt compelled to use Pat Misch occasionally as a “matchup” guy out of the bullpen in lefty-lefty situations – despite the fact that Misch has been significantly worse against left-handed batters.

2011 Projection

As with last year’s evaluation, it’s hard to believe that Misch’s September performance was enough to earn a guaranteed MLB contract in 2011 – but, again, I think it behooves the Mets to try to re-sign him to a AAA deal. I don’t believe he’ll turn into the next Glavine or Jamie Moyer, but you have to like his strike-throwing ability – which holds more value in a cavernous pitcher’s park such as Citi Field. While he won’t ever win a Cy Young, it’s plausible that he could fill a back-end spot over an extended period and not embarrass himself. The Mets need all the pitching depth they can find, and Misch’s presence in Buffalo won’t stunt the development of any rising prospects.

Click here to read the 2009 Analysis of Pat Misch

Joe Janish began MetsToday in 2005 to provide the unique perspective of a high-level player and coach -- he earned NCAA D-1 All-American honors as a catcher and coached several players who went on to play pro ball. As a result his posts often include mechanical evaluations, scout-like analysis, and opinions that go beyond the numbers. Follow Joe's baseball tips on Twitter at @onbaseball and at the On Baseball Google Plus page.
  1. murph November 2, 2010 at 12:29 am
    You call him the Poor Man’s Tom Glavine.
    I call him a younger version of Nelson Figueroa, in that the Mets will keep him around as a AAA starter for insurance, but will never give him a full time job in the rotation.

    And I don’t blame them. Because starting the season with Pat Misch as your 5th starter would be admitting that the Mets are no better than a team that has Pat Misch as their 5th starter.

  2. Walnutz15 November 2, 2010 at 8:18 am
    Pat Misch was another guy who was “ready”, yet was an after-thought for the 2010 Mets.

    Instead, Minaya hung his hat on filling (wasting) a roster spot on a 33-year old rookie, who never cracked a Major League roster: Raul Valdes.

    As we saw toward the end of 2009, Misch could have filled this kind of role with no problem, having experienced some good success….and is also capable of spot-starting.

    He continued that trend this year in Buffalo, earning Triple-A All-Star status.

    Let’s get something straight: Misch is no great shakes, overall…but really, what harm is there in seeing what these in-house types can provide?

    Especially in lieu of going after the same kind of crap, using valuable resources to do so. Guys like Raul Valdes are the typical kind of Met we’ve seen forever: get a shot with the organization; fade away…either because you’re at the end of your rope, or flat-out not good enough to be in The Bigs.

    Again, less of that going forward. Hopefully, Alderson sets the course for the ship….and we never look back.