Recent history suggests this week is crucial for Mets

2010-2012 Mets


Do you remember the 2010 Mets?

Through 90 games, the offense offered a lot to like: Jose Reyes leading off, David Wright having regained his power stroke, hotshot rookie Ike Davis impressing at the plate and in the field, and Angel Pagan seemingly coming into his own at age 28. On the mound, Johan Santana was still more or less Johan Santana, a new splitter had suddenly made Mike Pelfrey great again, 23-year-old lefty Jon Niese was more than holding his own, and R.A. Dickey was a revelation. Francisco Rodriguez was closing out wins, Pedro Feliciano was retiring a lefty or two every single day, and Hisanori Takahashi was the best swing man in the league.

The team’s record: 48-42.

Over the next 10 games, they went 3-7, effectively ending their playoff hopes, and beginning a spiral down below .500.

Carlos Beltran came off the DL but couldn’t play defense, Pagan shifted over to RF, hurting the team defensively at two positions, and neither guy hit down the stretch. Santana tired, K-Rod punched his father-in-law, Reyes pulled an oblique, and it was a sad September in Queens.

Do you remember the 2011 Mets?

Through 90 games, they were clutching out, keeping postseason hopes alive despite an underwhelming roster. With Santana and Ike Davis injured and Wright playing poorly through pain, the Mets nevertheless managed to string their hits together, taking quality AB after quality AB in big spots. They scored runs despite mediocre batting stats, and many were praising Dave Hudgens as a genius. With Jose Reyes putting up an MVP-type year, Lucas Duda getting a full-time job after crushing AAA Buffalo with a 1.011 OPS, and three apparent breakouts in progress (Bobby Parnell, Ruben Tejada, Daniel Murphy), the Mets had hope that if their starting pitching could just perform to their abilities, they’d have a chance.

The team’s record: 46-44.

Over the next 10 games, they went 4-6, effectively ending their playoff hopes, and beginning a spiral down below .500.

A 4-6 stretch is hardly ever the end of the world, but 50-50 is too mediocre a record too late in the season to come back from. Especially when none of the starters turn it around, Wright doesn’t heal, Parnell regresses, Murphy gets hurt, and Duda can’t play RF.

Do you remember the 2012 Mets?

Through 90 games, Wright was raking, Scott Hairston was raking, Dickey was throwing one-hitters, Ike Davis was on his way back after finding himself in the minors, and a finally-healthy Murphy was still teasing us with .300 promise. The futures of Kirk Nieuwenhuis and Ruben Tejada still looked promising, and there was Matt Harvey to look forward to. Optimism abounded for how the second half would be better than the first.

The team’s record: 46-44.

Over the next 10 games, they went 2-8, effectively ending their playoff hopes, and beginning a spiral down below .500.

Wright couldn’t keep it up. Tejada and Murphy and Captain Kirk didn’t live up to the big expectations. Dickey willed himself to 20 wins, and Ike and Harvey put up numbers, but it wasn’t nearly enough.

Are you worried about the 2016 Mets?

Through 90 games, there have been ups and downs. There have been great performances and disappointments. There is a lot of hope for a playoff run, but much of it rests on things improving — hurt players getting healthy, slumping players turning it around, hyped players living up to the hype. I’m finding it uncomfortably familiar.

The team’s record: 48-42.

Over the next 10 games, what will they do (so far they’re 2-2)? The answer may well decide their season. This upcoming series against the Marlins is big.

What will give the 2016 Mets the best chance to finish strong? If history is any guide, juggling outfielders and betting on improved health is not it.

David Berg has been following the Mets since 1990, and counts himself as a "die hard fan" -- the agonies have been numerous and arduous, but he's still watching every game he can, determined to "earn" the satisfaction when the Mets eventually win it all. In his non-spare time, David is a designer of graphics, web sites, and games. See his work at Shrike Design
  1. Dan Capwell July 21, 2016 at 12:10 pm
    I am very worried about the 2016 Mets. And I think this stretch is very crucial. Hoping for a 7-3 run, but not expecting it.

    Boy those memories make me very uncomfortable though.

  2. david July 21, 2016 at 10:33 pm
    Those that do not learn from their mistakes are doomed to repeat them. So what I learned from the history lesson is not to get my hopes up without a good reason in the form of a roster move or two.

    What I suggest is that Flores has earned a shot to play most days and think Reyes should be late game defense and pinch running. We need another starter as Verrett is hanging on by a thread as a starter but is a good piece out of the bullpen. And they need to release De Aza and call up Nimmo. Then Grandy’s at bats get curtailed, our bench is better and our pitching is better.

  3. argonbunnies July 21, 2016 at 10:58 pm
    Antonio Bastardo and cash for Joe Kelly? Two change of scenery candidates. Bastardo has the better track record and the Sox need relief help, at least short term. Kelly has more upside, but has blown chance after chance to find himself in Boston.

    Kelly could see what tweaks a new set of eyes would find, or simply face weaker lineups, and might be better than Verrett.

    I agree with David that Flores should play more and some of the regulars should see a little less playing time.

  4. Peter Hyatt July 22, 2016 at 5:43 pm
    “Past history” ??
    • David Berg July 24, 2016 at 1:10 pm
      Whoops! Fixed.
  5. Peter Hyatt July 22, 2016 at 5:43 pm
    “Past history” ??

    Professional writer?

  6. argonbunnies July 28, 2016 at 4:27 pm
    Okay, final tally from games 91-100: 5-5. Record after 100: 53-47. Better than 2010-2012? Yes. Good enough for a probable playoff path? No.

    Familia’s first blown save may have been the nail in the coffin. Proof that you can’t keep walking the leadoff guy (as Familia has done repeatedly this year) and you shouldn’t keep playing your speedy CF all the way over in a gap (woulda caught Molina’s hit if playing straight away).

    Cespedes should have been DLed through the All-Star break, and the Mets will now be without him for significant chunks of the remaining 62 games.

    Thor-deGrom-Matz-Colon is a good top 4, but not good enough to carry a team with no other strengths.

    The Mets could still make the playoffs, but they need something unexpectedly good to happen, like Conforto and Walker and Cabrera and Granderson and d’Arnaud all getting red hot at once.

    If I were the GM, I wouldn’t sacrifice any future pieces for small upgrades. Small upgrades are unlikely to suffice.

  7. James August 18, 2016 at 3:40 pm
    Now look at the record. 3-6 against Padres and Diamondbacks in the last 9 games. This one of the most prescient posts I’ve seen in a long time. If September is looming, the Mets are swooning.
  8. argonbunnies August 19, 2016 at 6:42 pm
    Oh man. My post from game 100 is looking pretty prescient too.

    Losing Cespedes? Check.

    Thor-deGrom-Matz-Colon not good enough? Check. Only deGrom has been excellent, the others have been up and down.

    Just one guy getting hot won’t suffice? Check. Neil Walker’s been on an absolute tear, but the guys around him haven’t, and the losses are piling up.

    Small upgrades not worth it? Check. Jay Bruce is a slightly better Curtis Granderson, and since he’s cold right now he’s contributed nothing, and he cost the Mets their possible second baseman of the future.

    Ow ow ow. Someone please find me a silver lining, quick.