Inside Look: Philadelphia Phillies

Coming off an abbreviated and disappointing two-game series in Atlanta, the Mets find their hands full with the Phillies, who come to Shea for the home opener.

To get a feel for what’s ticking inside the mind of a Phillies phan this early in the season, I called on Michael Berquist of A Citizen’s Blog.

1. Do the Mets scare you more or less compared to last year and why or why not?”

Unquestionably the Mets are a more talented and much more dangerous team than they were last season. The addition of Johan Santana and the return of Pedro Martinez gives the Mets some big guns to roll out in their rotation. However this analysis is contingent on Pedro and the rest of the aging Mets being healthy this season and that is a big if. Currently Moises Alou and Pedro are on the DL, so the gains that the Mets made in bringing Santana aboard might be erased otherwise.

I’m not of the opinion that the acquisition of Santana guarantees the Mets anything. The Mets rotation thrived on run support and defense last season, so Santana’s presence bolsters a unit that was in serious need of improvement. If Pedro and Santana are healthy and pitch at peek performance, then the Mets will be deadly. If Pedro is out, then the Mets need Santana to be great to beat the Phillies. Remember: even with Santana on the roster, the Twins posted a losing record in 2007. One man does not guarantee a pennant.

2. Did the Phillies do enough in the offseason to put an NL East champion back on the field in ’08?

I believe that the Phillies are a much-improved team over the ’07 version. In particular the team moved to strengthen their bullpen by acquiring Brad Lidge, which had the domino effect of strengthening the Phillies rotation by moving Brett Myers from closer to #2 in the rotation. Myers & Hamels presents the Phillies foes with a deeper, more dangerous rotation and Lidge gives the Phillies an effective closer, something they have really lacked since Billy Wagner left.

The ’08 Phillies are every bit as strong as the Mets and this ought to be an exciting pennant race.

3. How do you like Brad Lidge as your closer and Brett Myers back in the rotation?

See above!

Yes, the addition of Lidge helps the Phillies by improving the bullpen and the rotation. If Lidge can recapture the magic of 2004 and 2005, the Phillies will be very strong because Brett Myers posted impressive numbers as a starter with the Phillies in 2005 and 2006. Teaming Myers with Hamels gives the Phillies a formidable 1-2 punch.

4. What’s your take on the way the Phillies have handled Ryan Howard’s contract negotiations the last two years? Do you think they should lock him down long-term — and is that possible?

The Phillies need to tread lightly in their negotiations with Howard. The team is really in dangerous territory, having so many young players (e.g., Cole Hamels) who might want raises if the Phillies move now to lock in Howard to a long-term deal. That said, the Phillies need Howard’s bat in the lineup because his ability to clobber 50-60 home runs gives the Phillies a major weapon in the heart of their order.

Generally I think the team has handled itself well with Howard, though you do have to wonder if they might have been better off conceding defeat on the arbitration hearing and building up some goodwill with Howard. However, the Phillies probably can’t lock Howard into a long-term deal because teams like the Mets and Yankees and Red Sox have the financial resources that the Phillies don’t and have attractive media markets that can make Howard into a star on the order of Derek Jeter or A-Rod. Ryan Howard knows he can demand $18-20 mil on the open market and that is probably more than the Phillies want to pay.

My guess is that Ryan Howard’s days on the team are numbered.

5. What one individual is most important to the Phillies’ success in 2008?

Chase Utley was on track to win the 2007 MVP award before a pitch hit his hand and broke it, sidelining him for a month. Utley will be the vital link for the Phillies in 2008, one of the strongest bats in the N.L. (and a serious contender to win the triple crown), a defensive standout at a vital position, a real team leader.

The Phillies will go as far as Utley can carry them.

6. What is the key to the Phillies taking the series at Shea this week?

Pat Burrell has traditionally eaten Mets pitching alive (.921 career OPS vs. the Mets and 41 home runs and 102 RBI in 134 games) and is off to a hot start this season (as I write this Burrell has hit his third home run of the season and has six extra-base hits). If Burrell can continue his hot start and help carry the Phillies offense with Ryan Howard and Jimmy Rollins off to slow starts, the Phillies will have the firepower to push through the Mets in a series where they won’t have to deal with Santana.

Interesting responses from Michael — particularly regarding Chase Utley. I would have guessed he’d say Cole Hamels. And we were under the impression that Jimmy Rollins carried the team (LOL).

Thanks again to Michael, and be sure to check out A Citizen’s Blog for more “inside info” on the Philadelphia Phillies.

Joe Janish began MetsToday in 2005 to provide the unique perspective of a high-level player and coach -- he earned NCAA D-1 All-American honors as a catcher and coached several players who went on to play pro ball. As a result his posts often include mechanical evaluations, scout-like analysis, and opinions that go beyond the numbers. Follow Joe's baseball tips on Twitter at @onbaseball and at the On Baseball Google Plus page.
  1. RockStar78 April 7, 2008 at 9:48 pm
    So he thinks Utley has a serious shot to win the triple crown? How in the heck is little Chase Utley going to out homer Howard, Pujols, Fielder, etc.? I don’t see it.
  2. sincekindergarten April 8, 2008 at 5:19 am
    RS, let him believe that.
  3. isuzudude April 8, 2008 at 11:05 am
    In preparation for the series, the Mets have placed Matt Wise on the DL with a right forearm contusion. I think that’s just a fancy way of saying bruise. In his place the Mets recalled righty reliever Carlos Muniz. My question is, wouldn’t it have been a better idea to bring up Ricardo Rincon instead, if at least just for the series vs. Philly? The more lefties to take on Howard, Utley, and Jenkins the better, right? As it stands, I don’t even see Muniz getting any action in the series, unless there is a serious blowout. Willie won’t have any problem going to any of Sosa, Smith, or Heilman 3 games in a row before bringing in Muniz in a tight spot. At least with Rincon, you don’t care about spending him in a big spot in the 5th or 6th inning, even if just for one batter, because you’ll still have 3 more lefties to use later in the game. Oh well.
  4. joe April 8, 2008 at 1:24 pm
    That is an outstanding point, ‘dude (Rincon) I may have to steal it for the postgame article.

    The only thing that makes sense to me is that Rincon is not on the 40-man and Muniz is.

  5. isuzudude April 8, 2008 at 1:31 pm
    Glad to be of service, Joe. The only thing I can figure is that Rincon hasn’t pitched in a game for New Orleans yet, so maybe he’s dealing with an injury we haven’t heard about.

    The 40-man roster thing is easy to get around. Just transfer Burgos from the 15 to 60 day DL. So I don’t see that being an excuse. If Rincon is healthy, then I really don’t understand the move.

  6. joe April 8, 2008 at 2:13 pm
    i don’t think it’s a space issue … they have 3 open spots, including one for Burgos and one wasted on Ruddy Lugo.

    I’m wondering if it’s an injury as you suggest, or possibly something to do with options. For example, when they have to send Rincon back down, will they need to pass him through waivers?