Is Angel Pagan for Real?

Photo of Angel Pagan from

Can the Mets' Angel Pagan continue his current pace? Photo from

Through 151 plate appearances, Angel Pagan is hitting .305 with 2 HR, 7 doubles, 7 triples, 18 RBI, 8 SB, and a .344 OBP. His defense in centerfield has for the most part been very good, and his aggressive, all-out approach to the game has been inspiring. No doubt, he’s been a catalyst at the top of the lineup, jump-starting rallies and providing excitement for the fans.

Now, the million-dollar question: can he keep it up?

Already, some fans and pundits are wondering out loud if the Mets may be best served by moving Carlos Beltran this winter to make room for Pagan to take over centerfield. (I advocated trading Beltran last winter, but not to make room for an incumbent.)

Before our enthusiasm overtakes logic, let’s look at what Angel Pagan has been his entire career: a solid fourth outfielder with a broad skillset and a hustling approach to the game. In 550 career MLB at-bats, he has a .271 AVG., .323 OBP, 11 HR, and 70 RBI. Not bad for centerfielder. Not great, but not bad.

There are those who will argue that those numbers were compiled from the bench, and that when Pagan is given a full-time job, he’ll produce even better numbers. Indeed, one can point directly to the last month as evidence to support that claim.

Unfortunately, you can’t measure a player on a 24-game sample (I’m removing the 14 games he played before going on the DL). In fact, you can’t predict performance based on a sample double that size. Fans and the Mets themselves fell into this trap with Danny Murphy, who looked like Wade Boggs through his first 49 big league games and 151 at-bats. The problem is that baseball is often a game of highs and lows, of hot streaks and cold streaks, and it takes a very special ballplayer to sustain production over the course of a 162-game season.

Even in the minor leagues, Angel Pagan was never projected to be an MLB regular. An impressive athletic specimen, he always appeared “toolsy” but for whatever reason didn’t have enough of any one skill to suggest he’d be an everyday player. The more we see him play, the more that incompleteness is exposed.

For example, his best raw skill right now is probably his running ability — he’s used it to attain 7 triples, to steal 8 bases, and to outrun fly balls. However, we’ve already seen that his speed doesn’t make up for his lack of instincts on the basepaths. He ran wild for a few weeks, his over-aggressiveness embarrassed him, and now he’s tentative. Before you say it’s a matter of experience, remember he spent ten years and 640 games in the minor leagues. The bases down there are 90 feet apart, just as they are in MLB. If he hasn’t understood how to run the bases yet, when will he?

Similarly, though he has the capability and determination to make highlight-reel plays in the field, the fact is, he’s not an outstanding fielder. His arm is average, and both his fly ball judgment and routes to the ball are OK to good rather than good to great. At times he goes aggressively for balls to the point where he gets in the way of others (again, instincts). His speed often erases mistakes. I think back to Shawn Green, who in his younger days appeared to be an excellent fielder, but who looked awful once his feet slowed.

Finally, there is his bat. When he’s hot, he’s a doubles and triples machine — as we’re seeing right now. But eventually he’ll cool and his over-aggressiveness (another running theme) will get the best of him. His OBP is tied directly to his ability to hit safely, and he hasn’t shown the ability to be disciplined enough to draw walks consistently at the MLB level. Though he’s doing well in the leadoff spot right now, I doubt that’s the best place for his offensive skills over the long haul. Where he does fit, I’m not sure.

If Pagan were an outstanding fielder, then his streaky bat would be acceptable. But he’s not Mike Cameron out there. Unfortunately, he doesn’t have enough bat to play a corner outfield position, either. So what you have is a somewhat stronger, switch-hitting version of Endy Chavez. For a few teams, that’s good enough to start. On a team deigned for the postseason, that’s a fine fourth outfielder.

Before we conclude, I want to express that I enjoy watching Angel Pagan play the game. His approach is a breath of fresh air and an example to be followed. He absolutely has a place on a championship ballclub — but it is most likely as a key contributor off the bench, rather than as an everyday player.


Joe Janish began MetsToday in 2005 to provide the unique perspective of a high-level player and coach -- he earned NCAA D-1 All-American honors as a catcher and coached several players who went on to play pro ball. As a result his posts often include mechanical evaluations, scout-like analysis, and opinions that go beyond the numbers. Follow Joe's baseball tips on Twitter at @onbaseball and at the On Baseball Google Plus page.
  1. Joe August 7, 2009 at 1:33 pm
    Agreed. I’ve always been a big Pagan fan but he absolutely is not good enough to replace Beltran in center. One thing you didn’t focus too much on is his inability to stay healthy. He’s always played well but I think that this is the longest stretch he has played with the Mets without getting hurt.

    He’s done a good job filling in at CF for now, but I think Pagan is best used off the bench.

  2. Mike August 7, 2009 at 1:57 pm
    He and Jeremy Reed should be the backup outfielders next year with possibly Nick Evans if he develops a bit more power (as a power bat off the bench with limited playing time in the field). I absolutely would take that. Beltran should not be traded this off-season but perhaps next if Martinez shows he is ready for the 2011 season. Beltran’s contract is coming up I believe in 2011 so trading him before his walk year is probably smart.
  3. Walnutz15 August 7, 2009 at 2:30 pm
    Last thing I want to see is an anointment of Pagan as a “starting corner outfielder” for 2010, especially if there’s any sort of more-proven option on the open market, or via trade.

    However, he’d be a perfect 4th outfielder to keep around — especially considering Beltran’s current state — with his ability to capably handle Center Field.

    I definitely wouldn’t hinge a significant piece of offensive production on Angel Pagan’s bat in the everyday lineup (a’la Daniel Murphy’s LF experiment, circa 2009). We all know how that worked out this year…..and Pagan’s not even a safe-bet to stay healthy for the bulk of a 162-game season.

    Pagan’s August has started similar to his nice May, before getting hurt. Hopefully, he keeps it going and gets more confident on the basepaths…..but in a real outfield, he’s no more than a solid 4th.

    (As an aside: Since the Mets never truly have a “real” outfield, with 3 starting Major League-caliber options — then maybe Angel will stick around and contribute past this year.)

  4. joejanish August 7, 2009 at 3:03 pm
    joe – good point on the injury issue. Which reminds me, F-Mart has yet to get through a season without visiting the DL. I can see the Mets setting up LF for failure by counting on these two Glass Joes.

    mike – I agree, I really like Reed as an extra OF and PH. It would be nice to see Evans continue to develop into a solid backup 1B/OF/PH as well.

    ‘nutz – you KNOW the Mets, the pundits, and the fans are already penciling in Pagan as the LF, which is why I felt the need to write this post. And they’re silly enough to say the “backup plan” is F-Mart emerging. Not much different than believing Murphy / Tatis was a good idea, eh?

    Watch … the Mets won’t go after Matt Holliday this winter because they “like their in-house options”.

  5. Taylor August 7, 2009 at 3:07 pm
    Agree completely. Pagan is not a replacement level minor leaguer like some of the current Mets who are getting PT. But he’s not a starting outfielder for a contending team either. If he’s happy being a 4th outfielder then the Mets should keep him.
  6. Will August 7, 2009 at 4:52 pm
    I saw Pagan play in the minors for parts of two seasons and he struggled with Double A pitching.

    He’s definitely not an everyday starter. As some people have suggested, he’s a bit of Endy Chavez with a better bat.

  7. Other Blogs: Q&A, Late-Day Edition August 7, 2009 at 7:10 pm
    […] Janish of Mets Today wonders if Angel Pagan is for […]
  8. GSharpe August 7, 2009 at 9:38 pm
    This article in being written today … but you have 50 more games before you have to make any decision .

    He could be an Endy Chavez with more pop …

    … or he could be a younger Alex Rios .

    One thing in my mind is for certain . By the end of the year , you should have a sample size 3 times that what you had for Murphy .

    The decision should be made at that time … and not today .

  9. joejanish August 7, 2009 at 11:16 pm
    GSharpe, thanks for visiting and for your comments.

    In response … first of all, I think we’ve established that Pagan IS an Endy Chavez with more pop.

    Second, Pagan is all of FIVE MONTHS younger than Alex Rios. I sincerely doubt he’ll ever match Rios’ production, though you never know.

    Third, by the end of the year, Pagan’s sample size projects to be at around 300-350 at-bats, which is closer to double rather than 3x Murphy’s 2008 MLB season. But, I’ll give you the extra 100 ABs and ask why it matters? Pagan has already had over 600 plate appearances in the big leagues and the stats say he’s no better than a fourth outfielder.

    But sure, I’m happy to wait until the end of this year and re-visit the subject — it would be wonderful if he kept up this pace. Who knows, he could be a late bloomer.