Mets Game 133: Loss To Marlins

Marlins 6 Mets 0

so much depends
a read wheel
dazed with over
beside the florida

Mets Game Notes

Mike Pelfrey had his ups and downs but shut out the Fish through the first six innings, then ran into some minor trouble in the seventh that we’ll get into shortly. By the time he exited, Pelfrey allowed four runs on six hits and four walks in six innings, striking out three.

The turning point in the game came in seventh, with men on first and second and opposing pitcher Javier Vazquez at the plate. Anticipating a bunt, the Mets chose to run the “wheel play”, which means that the third baseman and first baseman charge aggressively, the shortstop covers third, and the plan is to try and nail the runner going from second to third. Almost always, the second baseman will cover first, so that if there is no play at third, you can still get an out at first. For some reason, Justin Turner was covering second, which meant there was no one to cover first. I’m not sure if the play was designed that way, but it was crystal clear that Turner was covering second long before the pitch was thrown — he was about three feet away from second base. So if the play was NOT designed to have Turner covering second, there was plenty of time for someone to call time (such as catcher Josh Thole), and/or for Pelfrey to step off the rubber. If it WAS designed that way, then whomever fields the bunt MUST throw to third no matter what, and failing that, throw to second. As it was, David Wright and Nick Evans charged, Reyes raced to third, Turner to second, Wright picked up the bunt by Vazquez, did not have a play at 3B, did not have a play at 2B, and Vazquez trotted to first base without a throw. The final result was bases loaded, none out — which is generally worse than one out, men on second and third. If you missed the game then you missed the Marlins turn that debacle into a five-run inning; I won’t get into the details, because they are just that — just know that Pelfrey fell apart at that point, because, well, that’s what he does. The bottom line is: what the heck was going on with that wheel play? William Carlos Williams would’ve been tongue-tied.

Though, it didn’t matter all that much, because it is difficult to win when you don’t score any runs in the first nine innings. The Mets were shut out on six hits and one walk, and went down swinging eight times. The low walk total suggests that the Mets once again went with the reverse scouting report of swinging early in the count instead of looking for the walk — but it didn’t work out well. Vazquez limited them to three hits and a walk through the first seven — anyone else wondering how Javy went from horrendous to pristine as a result of the All-Star Break? Hmm…

David Wright and Josh Thole both went 2-for-3, and Jose Reyes stole his 35th base. That was the extent of the offensive excitement.

Next Mets Game

The Mets and Marlins play again on Wednesday night in a 7:10 PM start. Chris Capuano faces Chris Volstad.

Mets 2011 Games

About the Author

Joe Janish began MetsToday in 2005 to provide the unique perspective of a high-level player and coach -- he earned NCAA D-1 All-American honors as a catcher and coached several players who went on to play pro ball. As a result his posts often include mechanical evaluations, scout-like analysis, and opinions that go beyond the numbers. Follow Joe's baseball tips on Twitter at @onbaseball and at the On Baseball Google Plus page.

See All Posts by This Author

If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed.


7 Responses to “Mets Game 133: Loss To Marlins”