The Rollins Benching

Before the Fourth of July weekend, I received a great email from loyal reader “isuzudude”:

I have an interesting topic you may want to elaborate on in a post. Much was made here in New York on the benching of Jimmy Rollins back on June 5th when Charlie Manuel benched the reigning MVP for not legging out a ground ball. However, did you know that since that incident Rollins has fallen into a 17 for 78 slump (.217) to see his average drop from .289 to .265. What’s more, since the benching the Phillies have gone 8-12 (including the game Rollins was benched in, which the Phillies won 5-0).

Interestingly, Willie Randolph benched Jose Reyes in simlar fashion around this time last year (July 6th at Houston to be exact). Reyes also responded poorly by slumping over the rest of the season, and some would argue his benching – and subsequent lack of confidence/focus – became the root cause for the Mets 2nd half collapse.

Do you believe the two occurences are related? Is this mere coincidence? There’s no doubting, though, that Rollins HAS NOT responded well to his benching, so what is your explanation? I’d really like to know your take on this topic.

Thanks, and as always, keep up the fantastic work!

(Note to readers: include an ego-stroking compliment like that last sentence, and your question is GUARANTEED to be answered.)

I have to admit that at the time I lauded Charlie Manuel’s move to bench Rollins. And if I knew that Rollins would go into a 17-for-78 slump, I’d still have believed Manuel made the right move.

In my mind, Manuel had to establish that he was the boss of the team – even if it meant his starting shortstop would shove his head up his butt as a result. No one man is bigger than the team (yes, even if that man is Barry Bonds – see any World Series rings on Bonds’ fingers?).

The concept of team over individual, and one man in charge, was relayed beautifully in the movie “Hoosiers” – specifically, when Gene Hackman’s character allowed two of the team’s top players to walk off the team, and later when he played four men on the floor with a punished player staying on the bench. In the short term, yes, a team may be negatively affected, but over the long run, the team is much better off. Winning teams have rules, structure, and a shared focus toward one goal. If anything gets in the way of that shared focus, it has to be eliminated – immediately.

Getting back to Rollins. Indeed, the benching would seem to have affected him offensively. My guess is it was a hard slap of reality, a knocking him off his high horse, so to speak. It was understandable – almost predictable – that Rollins would sulk and perform below his normal level of play. Great athletes don’t like to be publicly embarrassed, and it can take a while for them to come around to the realization that they were wrong.

As for the Phillies’ 8-15 record over that stretch, I believe it had more to do with the fact that Rollins wasn’t producing rather than anything emotional, or any group reaction to the benching. The Phils rely heavily on the bats of Rollins, Chase Utley, and Ryan Howard – if one of those three are slumping, the lineup is not nearly as frightening (think about when Jose Reyes, David Wright, or Carlos Beltran are in a slump).

How did this benching compare with that of Reyes last year? There are a number of similarities. Without doubt, Reyes felt he was wronged by Willie Randolph (I’d have agreed). Reyes watched dogs like Carlos Delgado jog around all year while he raced around the basepaths, and the one time he didn’t run out what he thought was a foul ball, he was scolded. As a result, Reyes sulked, he didn’t provide any offense after the benching, and the Mets’ lineup wasn’t strong enough to make up for his virtual absence. Had Randolph benched someone for not hustling way back in June – when nearly everyone BUT Reyes was going through the motions, he could have nipped the issue in the bud and the season might have turned out differently. We’ll never know.

By the way, in the first three games of July, Rollins went 6-for-11 with a 1.552 OPS. Clearly, he’s over the benching. And oh by the way, the Phillies won all three games.

Posted in Mets Mailbag | 6 Comments

Mets Game 88: Win Over Phillies

Mets 4 Phillies 2

I have to admit, it looked to me like the Mets were destined to lose this one.

However, they hung tough, somehow preventing the sluggin’, fightin’ Phils from stealing away the ballgame.

Oliver Perez was absolutely outstanding, pitching seven shutout innings of 4-hit ball. He was in trouble from inning one, but never got flustered, kept his cool, and did a miraculous job of working out of tough jams. While his last start against the Yankees was his most dominating, this outing was his most impressive. Ollie was presented with every possible concentration-disrupting situation, and he remained both focused and confident. I have no idea what he’s been eating for breakfast lately, but I want some. This is the Oliver Perez we’ve been dying to see since the 2006 postseason.

Ollie didn’t need much support, and received all he needed from a Carlos Beltran solo homer in the third. Beltran drove in an insurance run in the top of the ninth — but unfortunately the Mets needed a better policy. While the bridge to Billy Wagner did its job, Wagner did not, blowing his sixth save of the season. Wags gave up a two-run homer to Jayson Werth with two outs and a 1-2 count to tie up the ballgame.

With the way balls tend to fly out of Citizens Bank Park, and the number of homerun hitters on the Phillies, it seemed only a matter of time before someone in the Philly lineup lofted one beyond the fence in the bottom of a frame. However, Scott Schoeneweis retired the lefties and Joe Smith spun 2 1/3 scoreless innings to keep the Mets in the ballgame.

Finally, in the top of the twelfth, Carlos Delgado led off with a walk and was sacrificed to second by Damion Easley (an excellent bunt, by the way). Fernando Tatis followed with a deep fly to left center that found the seats to put the Mets ahead 4-2. Smith phinished ophph the Phillies in the bottom of the twelphth to secure the victory.

Notes

Beltran finally hit in the clutch, coming up with the homerun and the clutch single in the ninth. He and Jose Reyes were both 3-for-6 on the evening.

In 12 innings, the Mets left 14 runners on base. As individuals, the Mets batters stranded 23.

It took three pitchers — Pedro Feliciano, Aaron Heilman, and Duaner Sanchez — to get through the eighth.

Is it me, or does it seem like the Mets are always getting burned by not the Utley-Howard-Rollins trio, but Jayson Werth, Shane Victorino, or Greg Dobbs?

Speaking of Werth, he jumped on that 1-2 slider by Wagner like he knew it was coming. Either he was guessing slider or Billy is tipping his pitches. In my humble opinion, Billy needs to start humming that fastball inside and making the batters move their feet when he gets ahead. Wagner’s fastball is no longer in the upper 90s, but rather around 94, so he needs to make some adjustments in his approach.

While we’re on the subject of making batters move their feet, Joe Smith came up to bat for only the second time in his young career. He stood about six feet away from home plate, and was bailing out on every pitch. To his credit, he did take a couple of hacks en route to an ugly strike out.

Next Game

The phour-game series in Philly concludes on Monday at 7:05 pm. Pedro Martinez goes against Adam Eaton. Personally, I won’t be concerned if the Mets lose. By winning two games, they have at least treaded water against the Phillies — which to me is better than falling behind. My hope is that eventually, the Mets will go on a tear after Pedro figures things out, Ryan Church and Moises Alou become regulars in the lineup, Johan Santana has his trademark dominating second half, and someone among Beltran, Reyes, and Wright goes on an extended hot streak. Yes, I am spouting optimism — though guarded. If the Mets can just stay close until the All-Star break, they have a fair shot of making a strong run at the division title. Let’s hope it’s an exciting summer.

Posted in Mets 2008 Games | 12 Comments

Mets Game 87: Win Over Phillies

Mets 9 Phillies 4

For a change, the Mets did a number of things that we haven’t seen too often this season.

Such as, they came from behind to win, late in a game. They pounded out 14 hits. Pinch-hitters supplied three hits, two runs, and four RBI. The bullpen held a lead. John Maine pitched inside.

Maine, in fact, might have been the most encouraging story of the night. After a poor outing blamed on a “dead arm”, Maine bounced back to pitch 5 2/3 innings, striking out 5, walking 2, and allowing just one hit to the powerful Phillies offense. Unfortunately, that one hit was a three-run homer by Ryan Howard. Other than that one mistake, Maine was as close to “lights out” as he’s been in months.

The Mets, however, couldn’t overcome the Howard homer in time to give Maine a win. Instead, they continued with the one thing that has been plaguing them all year – leaving runners on base. I thought 15 LOB was an extraordinary number on Friday night, but the Mets showed they could be even more miserable, leaving a collective 19 runners on the bases. NINETEEN. Yes, I know they scored nine runs, and that was great. But to leave 19 runners on base is astounding (the team’s LOB by inning was 9 — still kind of high).

Because of all those stranded runners, the game was a lot closer than the final score would tell you. The Mets jumped ahead 1-0 thanks to the patented “Get Jose on and David will drive him home” first-inning routine. Unfortunately, Wright swung at an awful pitch while ahead on the count and hit into a double play – which scored Reyed but got Jamie Moyer off the hook of what could’ve been a bigger inning. The Mets added another two runs in the top of the fourth when Wright doubled, stole third, and scored on an error by Howard, and then red-hot Damion Easley drove in Carlos Beltran a few moments later. In the bottom of the frame, however, Howard made up for the miscue with his homer, tying up the game.

The game remained tied until the seventh, when the Phillies scratched out a run against Joe Smith and Pedro Feliciano (ironically, Feliciano was awarded with the victory, despite giving up the go-ahead run).

Beltran led off the eighth with a groundout, but Easley and Carlos Delgado hit back-to-back singles, setting the table for pinch-hitter Marlon Anderson. Reliever Tom Gordon uncorked a wild pitch to score Easley with the tying run, and after Anderson walked, Endy Chavez grounded to first to move the runners to second and third. With the score tied, Brian Schneider came up to hit for the pitcher, and hit he did – a double to deep right center that scored two runs and put the Mets ahead 6-4.

Duaner Sanchez held the Phillies scoreless in the bottom of the eighth, and the Mets tacked on three more runs in the top of the ninth in a most unspectacular fashion. Fernando Tatis led off with a double, but from there on runs were plated thanks to an error, a fielder’s choice, and a single by Chavez.

Tony Armas, Jr. finished off the Phillies with a perfect ninth.

Notes

Wright and Reyes both hit their 21st doubles of the season. Wright, however, left five runners on base.

Easley was 3-for-5 with two runs scored and an RBI.

Carlos Delgado stroked two singles, lifting his average to .237. Carlos Beltran walked twice and scored twice, but went hitless and is now floundering at .259.

The lefty – righty matchup thing was a little ridiculous in this game. In the seventh, the Phillies sent up pinch-hitter Greg Dobbs, a lefty, to face Joe Smith. The Mets countered with LOOGY Pedro Feliciano, and Dobbs was replaced with righty Jayson Werth. While Werth hit an RBI single, in the process the Phils burned through a consistent Met killer in Dobbs. The next inning, with Ramon Castro scheduled to hit with runners on the corners, RHP Tom Gordon was summoned to the mound. The Mets then sent Marlon Anderson to hit for Castro. Why? For no other reason than to put a lefty hitter vs. a righty pitcher? Because Marlon is hitting only .200. What would have made much more sense would be to leave Castro – who’s been swinging a hot bat lately – in the game, and putting Anderson or better yet Endy Chavez in the game to pinch-run for cinderblock-footed Carlos Delgado at first base. Delgado, after all, represented the winning run.

As it was, Charlie Manuel looked good after Werth hit the go-ahead single, and Jerry Manuel looked like a genius, because the Mets scored three runs in that convoluted inning.

Ryan Church left the game in the eighth, complaining of dizziness. Crap. Maine left the game with a cramped LEFT forearm – or at least, that’s how it was reported by AP. Hmm ….

Next Game

Oliver Perez faces Kyle Kendrick in a 1:05 pm start on Sunday in Philadelphia.

Posted in Mets 2008 Games | 4 Comments

Mets Game 86: Loss to Phillies

Phillies 3 Mets 2

So much for the sweep.

The Mets blew a golden opportunity to take the first of this vital four-game series – and everyone was to blame.

“Everyone”, by the way, includes everyone – the entire lineup, the bench, manager Jerry Manuel, the pregame chef, and yes, even Johan Santana.

No doubt, many are second-guessing Jerry Manuel’s decision to lift the “ace” after eight innings of two-run ball. Personally, I don’t think it was as awful a move as some suggest. But that’s because to me, the game was already long lost. You see, the Mets lost this game in the fifth inning – the only inning in which they scored a run. Their execution with runners on base was akin to an American Legion team whose best hitter was away on vacation.

Despite Santana’s 8 spectacular innings of 8-hit, 2-run baseball, I am going to be one of the few who blames Johan for losing the game. Not with his arm, mind you, but with his bat.

In the fifth inning, the Mets had rookie hurler J.A. Happ on the ropes. Happ had loaded the bases with none out after allowing a leadoff single to Damion Easley, a double to Ramon Castro, and a walk to Chris Aguila. Happ then went 2-0 to Santana. Unbelievably, Santana swung at the 2-0 pitch, which was ball three. He then fouled off ball four, and struck out on ball five.

Am I too critical? No, I don’t think so. Yes, Santana is paid to pitch, but he didn’t have to hit in this situation – in fact, he had to do the opposite. Happ was in dire straits, and had Santana simply left his bat on the shoulder – instead of inexplicably hacking away – he would have walked to force in the first run of the game. Besides having another run, there would have been one less out – an out that might have come later, might have come after another run or two could have scored. These are the little details of ballgames that are often (read: always) the difference between winning and losing. These tiny, seemingly unimportant moments are called “fundamentals”, the Mets’ persistent lack of execution in them is the main reason they are a sub-.500 team.

Granted, the offense should have scored more than two measly runs off J.A. Happ in the four and one-third innings he pitched. But it wasn’t for lack of hitting skill, or the ability to put the bat on the ball, as much as it was the boneheaded decisions made by the batters.

The Phillies, meanwhile, did what they normally do. Their pitchers used a collection of magic tricks, hocus pocus, and smoke and mirrors to keep the other team’s lineup at bay. Chase Utley, Ryan Howard, Jayson Werth, and Pat Burrell found a way to manufacture runs. Then, the fightin’ Phils pulled off a dramatic, emotional, come-from-behind, walkoff win in their last at-bat. Sometimes I think every game they play against the Mets is scripted and rehearsed.

Duaner Sanchez took the loss. Dirty struck out the first two batters he faced in the ninth – Ryan Howard and Pat Burrell — then gave up a double to Pedro Feliz, and was kind enough to allow the game-winning single to Shane Victorino moments later. Let’s face it – the Phillies were going to win this game sooner or later. Better it was sooner, so we could get on with watching the fireworks and enjoying the evening.

Notes

The Mets also lost an opportunity to score a run in the first, when Jose Reyes led off the game with a walk, moved to second on a groundout by Endy Chavez, stole third base, and was left stranded there by David Wright (who popped to second) and Carlos Beltran (who flied to right). I can maybe forgive Wright because he might have been trying to lift the ball to the outfield, for a sac fly, and got a little too much under it. Beltran I would forgive as well, except that he’s been hitting around .086 over the last two weeks, and lately has failed miserably with men in scoring position. In this game, Beltran stranded five baserunners – while the Mets as a team left an astounding 15 runners on base.

The feeble Mets hitters managed only four hits in the game, but they walked four times.

I didn’t see the postgame, but I hope Johan didn’t open his mouth again and criticize his team. That act is getting old. Yeah, his ERA has been fabulous, and the team is giving him zero run support, but the bottom line is, he’s 0-4 since Jerry Manuel took over, and currently carries a .500 record. He can’t do everything, but we don’t need to hear that fact from him. He can bitch all he wants about the team only getting four hits in this game, but he was part of the offensive problem. Winners make smart decisions (on the mound, in the field, and at the bat), they don’t make excuses, and they don’t blame others for losses. Santana has proven so far to be a good, sometimes very good pitcher, but he has yet to show us he’s a winner.

Next Game

John Maine vs. Jamie Moyer at 7:05 pm. Is this the game the 50/50 Mets win, or is it another one where they find a way to lose?

Posted in Mets 2008 Games | 4 Comments

Bayonne Bullet on the Block

joe_borowski.jpgThe Cleveland Indians have DFA’d Joe Borowski, a.k.a. the “Bayonne Bullet”. He’s also known as the 2007 AL saves leader.

This season, however, Borowski has struggled mightily, with a 7.56 ERA in 18 games coming back from yet another arm injury — this time a right triceps strain. Borowski’s arm woes have plagued his career, and this most recent one has stolen a few more miles off his already not-so-fast fastball.

Unfortunately for the Bullet, he can’t afford to lose velocity. His sinker isn’t of the devastating sort, his breaking pitch is mediocre at best, and his change-up is not in the realm of Johan Santana’s — or Aaron Heilman’s, for that matter. Even at the top of his game, Borowski is far from dominating, and doesn’t trick anyone. The guy simply throws strikes, gives everything he has, and hopes for the best.

Borowski’s release is only the beginning for the Indians, who are on the verge of mailing in the 2008 season and looking at building for next year. Expect them to shop free-agent-to-be C.C. Sabathia heavily, as well as veterans such as Casey Blake, Jamey Carroll, David Dellucci, Paul Byrd, and possibly Rafael Betancourt. Salivate all you want over Sabathia — unfortunately the only guy the Mets might have a shot at getting from that group is Carroll. Ho hum.

Should the Mets give Borowski a flyer? Why the heck not? Since they have absolutely nothing in the way of trading chips, it behooves them to pick up anyone with previous MLB success. Take a look at the AAA roster in New Orleans, and tell me there’s someone head and shoulders above Borowski in the Zephyrs’ bullpen. We already have discovered the Carlos Muniz is not ready for prime time — though I’m willing to continue to give him chances — and after Muniz there’s not much. Unless the likes of Jose Santiago and Nate Field get you excited.

Pick up the Bullet, put him in NOLA, and hope for the best. Who knows, maybe he just needs a little more time off, or a change in arm angle, or a move to the other side of the rubber. Borowski — ever the survivor — has reinvented himself before, so why not roll the dice on the guy with the big heart?

Posted in News Notes Rumors, Pitching Staff | Comments Off on Bayonne Bullet on the Block

Preview: Mets vs. Phillies

If there was ever a time for the Mets to shake this win-one, lose-one thing, it’s now.

The Mets invade Philadelphia phor a a three-game phor-game series with the phirst-place Phillies. The series could mean nothing. Or, it could mean everything.

As it stands now, the Mets have a 42-43 record, four and a half games out of first. The fightin’ Phils are 47-39, and have the 44-41 Florida Fish as a buffer zone between themselves and the Mets.

If the Mets split, the series is a wash. If they lose three, it won’t have much effect one way or the other. Oh, sure, the Mets will drop down another game or two, but we’re at a point now where it doesn’t matter much. We can still say “there’s plenty of season left”, “Johan is a second-half pitcher”, “Moises Alou will come back healthy after the All-Star break”, and similar delusions.

Interestingly, if the Mets take three of four, it will be equally indifferent. Yeah, winning the series will be nice, but it will make their record on game over .500, and they’ll still be about four games back.

However, if the Mets sweep, it’s a whole new ballgame.

A sweep would put the Mets at 46-43. A few games over .500 doesn’t look so encouraging, but it’s what they’ll do to the Phillies’ loss column that matters. You see, a sweep by the Mets increases the Phillies’ loss total to 42, and the Mets will still be at 43 — separating the two teams by only one loss. The beauty of looking at loss totals is this: as the season progresses, you can win more, but you can’t lose less.So although the Phillies would be five games over .500 after suffering a sweep, they’ll be in a tougher position because they’ll have already played 91 games to the Mets’ 89. Now again, look at the loss column. The Mets will have two extra games between now and the end of the season — two games they have an opportunity to win. In contrast, the Phillies can’t erase the two extra losses.

Of course, there’s no guarantee that the Mets will win those two extra games, or that they’ll win enough in the second half to make those two games matter. But we can dream, can’t we?

Here are the pitching matchups:

Friday: Johan Santana vs. J.A. Happ
A few weeks ago, this is a no-brainer: pocket a win for the Mets. However, Johan has yet to win under Jerry Manuel’s leadership, and despite a sparkling ERA has performed short of expectations. His velocity is down, gopher balls are up, and he’s already thrown David Wright under the bus. The Mets beat up on Happ in his lone start last year, but Happ has been outstanding in AAA of late. No guarantees here.

Saturday: John Maine vs. Jamie Moyer
Again, this should be a guaranteed win for the Mets, but Maine has fallen on hard times lately, the victim of a “dead arm” (or is it a dead head?). The 86-year-old Moyer is kryptonite against overly aggressive lineups such as the Mets, and seems to always find a way to keep the Mets handcuffed over six to seven innings. I’d love to say Maine’s going to step up and take this game, but there’s this lingering doubt in my mind.

Sunday: Oliver Perez vs. Kyle Kendrick
Ollie Perez is synonymous with “tossup”. We don’t know what Kendrick will bring to the table, and we don’t care, because his performance is moot in relation to the game’s outcome. If Ollie pitches up to his competition, the way he did in the Bronx last week, then the Mets will win — end of story. If Mr. Hyde shows up, then the Mets will either pack it in after falling behind early, or will have to temporarily take on the Phillies’ offensive personality and turn the game into home run derby. As much as I love the Mets, I don’t like their chances in a slugfest against the Phillies. I’m not a betting man, so I won’t put money on nor against Ollie. I will, however, cross my fingers in hopes that Mr. Hyde stays far away.

Monday: Pedro Martinez vs. Adam Eaton

Like Ollie Perez and lately John Maine, we have no idea what Pedro will give us — it’s a complete crapshoot. And speaking of crap, there’s Adam Eaton, perhaps the crappiest starting pitcher in the National League, who for some reason manages to pitch like Christy Mathewson against the Mets.

Bottom Line

Can the Mets sweep the Phillies and therefore make the second half exciting? Of course — anything is possible. Will they? Probably not. Personally, I’m going to assume that the Mets continue their win / lose pattern, and hope they take at least one or two of these games. If they take three, great — it will be a pleasant surprise. If that sounds pessimistic, I apologize, but the reality is that thus far, the Mets have not given me any reason to expect dominance.

Posted in Series Previews | 4 Comments

Mets Game 85: Win Over Cardinals

Mets 11 Cardinals 1

Win. Lohse. Win. Lose. Win. If the Mets keep up this pace, they might just win 80 games.

As expected, the 50/50 Mets beat the Cardinals in the final game of their four-game series. Actually, they didn’t just beat them — they pounded, battered, and fried the Redbirds.

The Mets jumped out to a three-run lead in the initial inning, scoring runs unspectacularly but scoring them nonetheless. An infield single by Damion Easley and two walks loaded the bases for Carlos Delgado, who lifted a fly ball to right to plate Endy Chavez. Another infield single scored David Wright, and then Ryan Church scored on an error by starting pitcher Mitchell Boggs.

That was only the beginning of Boggs’ struggles, however. After Wright flied out to lead off the inning, the Mets loaded the bases again, this time on a double by Church, a walk to Delgado, and another infield by Easley. Anderson followed with a fielder’s choice to score Church, and Ramon Castro was unintentionally intentionally walked to re-load the bases. Pitcher Mike Pelfrey then rapped a surprising single, driving in the first run of his young career. What was evolving into a bad outing by Boggs turned downright ugly, when Jose Reyes slammed a bases-clearing triple to make the score 8-zip. Chavez singled him home a few moments later, and Boggs faced — and retired — Wright for the second time of the inning.

At one point in the frame, Tony LaRussa came out to tell Boggs that no one was warming in the bullpen, no one would be, and he would have to take one for the team. Or something equally inspirational.

To add insult to ugliness, Delgado drove a two-run homer over the rightfield wall to put the Mets up 11-0 in the sixth.

While all this crazy run-scoring was going on, Pelfrey put together yet another dominating outing. He pitched seven full innings, allowing only one run on six hits and two walks while striking out six, expending 109 pitches in the process. Scott Schoeneweis and Joe Smith tossed the last two frames to close out the laugher.

Notes

Pelfrey’s ERA has now sunk to 4.23, and his record is even at 6-6. He induced 8 ground balls and 6 fly balls in his seven innings.

Carlos Delgado continues to mash AA pitching. He went 5-for-12 with 4 RBI in St. Louis.

In taking one for the team, Boggs’ ERA swelled to 6.59. He entered the game with a fairly svelte 4.37 ERA.

Reyes now leads all of MLB with 10 triples, and this last one counted as 62 in his career — tying him with Mookie Wilson for first on the Mets’ all-time list.

Red-hot David Wright had no hits but walked twice and scored twice.

Chris Aguila was promoted from NOLA to take Carlos Muniz’s spot on the roster. He pinch-hit for Delgado in the eighth and struck out against Bergenfield H.S. alum Ron Villone.

Good field, no hit middle infielder Argenis Reyes was also promoted, taking Luis Castillo’s roster spot. Castillo went on the 15-day DL after being diagnosed as prematurely aging. OK, that’s not entirely true; the explanation we were given was that he’s “hurting all over”. From one who has suffered the malaise, it sounds to me like a case of dengue fever, a.k.a. “breakbone fever” or “bonecrusher disease”. Luckily my doctor happens to be the infectious disease specialist for the Mets, so he’ll be able to spot and treat it right away. From the symptoms, it has to be either dengue or “Alou Affliction”.

Next Game

On the Fourth of July the Mets begin a three-game weekend series in the home of the Liberty Bell. Former Minnesota Twins ace Johan Santana looks to stop a personal three-game losing streak against J.A. Happ of the Phillies. Game time at Citizens Bank Park in Philadelphia is 7:05 pm. Fireworks are guaranteed this evening.

Posted in Mets 2008 Games | 1 Comment

Mets Game 84: Loss to Cardinals

Cardinals 8 Mets 7

Win. Lose. Win. Lose. Win. Lose. The pattern continues …

This game was dramatic, full of emotional highs and lows. Pedro Martinez was pelted early, but hung in there for five innings, and just when it seemed like the Mets were “calling it in”, they came back to tie the game. Then they were tied. Then they went ahead. Then they were tied.

And then, in true Vince Lombardi fashion, the Mets didn’t really lose the game — they simply ran out of time.

That’s not entirely true, actually. In truth, the Mets lost this game several times, and even after going ahead 7-5, it “felt” like they were about to relinquish the lead again. And they did. Quickly.

Pedro was once again awful. We don’t know if he was tipping pitches (as he claimed in his last start) or was simply ineffective. But the bottom line was, he gave up four runs in the first inning to put the Mets into a deep hole right away.

But the Mets found a way back, buoyed perhaps by a 45-minute rain delay that seemed to wipe the slate clean. They scored three runs in the third on a two-run double by Carlos Beltran and a single by Damion Easley, then tied the game the next inning when a Jose Reyes triple was followed by an Endy Chavez sac fly. The Cardinals, however, battled back themselves, untying things in the fifth on a solo homer by Rick Ankiel. Pedro was removed after that frame, and Joe Smith kept St. Louis scoreless in the sixth.

In the seventh, the Mets jumped all over Mark Mulder in his second career relief appearance, exploding for three runs via every way imaginable — walks, singles, hit by pitches, sacrifice flies, you name it. But still, the two-run lead felt kind of … fragile.

So when the Cardinals came back with two runs of their own in the eighth, it wasn’t much of a surprise. Remarkably, Aaron Heilman held them in the seventh, but was brought out to start the 8th and began the frame by plunking Ryan Ludwick. Pedro Feliciano came on in relief and promptly gave up a two-run homer to pinch-hitter Chris Duncan to once again tie the game. At that point, it was clear that this game would not be a storybook ending for the Mets — it was only a matter of time before they found a way to lose it.

And lose it they did indeed in the ninth — nearly twice, in fact. With Carlos Muniz on the mound, Ankiel very nearly hit his second homerun of the game, blasting a fly to centerfield that dropped just inches from the fence. However, Troy Glaus — who had hit a three-run bomb in the first frame — DID hit his second homer of the game, having the sense to send his fly to the shorter porch in left field to win the game for the Redbirds.

Sigh.

Notes

The Mets wasted 3-for-4 days by both David Wright and Damion Easley. Easley drove in three runs and Wright scored two. Jose Reyes also had three hits, though in five ABs, and Ryan Church went 2-for-5.

Wright, by the way, is 24-for-58 (.414) in his last 16 games, and is creeping toward .300 for the season.

Carlos Muniz was unceremoniously optioned back to New Orleans immediately after the game. While I admit I clamored for his promotion, he did absolutely nothing to prove he could be effective in an impactful role at this point in time. Too bad, as the Mets could really use a 7th / 8th inning guy right now. My guess is Muniz’s issue is more to do with confidence than anything else, because his stuff isn’t all that bad.

No word yet on who will replace Muniz on the roster. Nelson Figueroa?

Next Game

The final game of this four-game set takes place at 8:15 pm EST, with Mike Pelfrey going to the mound against rookie Mitchell Boggs, who is 3-0. If the Mets follow their current pattern, they should win the game. Win one, lose one, etc., etc.

Posted in Mets 2008 Games | 5 Comments