Series Preview: Mets vs. Reds

Cincinnati Reds baseball logo from 1960sIn September 2006, the Cincinnati Reds were making a legitimate run for the NL Central title, and finished the season in third place, just three and a half games behind the NL-champion St. Louis Cardinals.

Fast forward to the All-Star Break 2007, and the once-rising Reds are sitting in the cellar of the NL Central, 13 games out of first place. What was once a promising season has evolved into a lost one, and Cincinnati is on the brink of a fire sale at the trading deadline. One would guess that the struggling Mets are facing the Reds at the right time, and in the right place.

As always, the most complete scouting reports on the Cincinnati Reds pitchers can be found at MetsGeek.

Game One: Orlando Hernandez vs. Bronson Arroyo

El Duque was hit hard and had poor command in his last start in Colorado, but we’ll give him the benefit of the doubt and blame it on the thin air. After all, the lack of humidity at that altitude more or less eliminates the sharpness of the curveball — his bread and butter. A return to Shea and weeks’ worth of rest should do Duque right.

Arroyo was a sensation upon his return to the NL last year, but has not come close to the success the second time around the league. He’s been hit hard, and there are questions that he was overworked last year (he logged 240 innings). However, he’s strung together three straight strong starts, and is coming into Shea on a high note. He gave the Mets fits last year, and will try to ride that confidence toward a successful outing.

Game Two: John Maine vs. Matt Belisle

Maine finished the first half on a high note, pitching perhaps his strongest and most inspired outing. Some of it may have been driven by his being snubbed for the All-Star squad, and we can only hope he’s still mad going in to the second-half. An angry John Maine is one tough customer.

Matt Belisle is relatively unknown to the Mets, which immediately sends up a red flag (pardon the pun) and invokes the Wandy Rodriguez Effect. A converted reliever, he’s a fastball-curveball guy who has trouble against lefthanded batters. Lately, he’s had a lot of trouble with walks and homeruns, and hopefully that trend will continue against the Mets.

Game Three: Tom Glavine vs. Aaron Harang

Tommy’s coming off a strong outing against Houston, but will be facing a more powerful Cincinnati lineup in this start. He’s had bouts with his command this year, as well as the long ball, and that’s not a good combination against the likes of Adam Dunn, Ken Griffey Jr., and rookie phenom Josh Hamilton. Glavine will have to take advantage of the free-swinging nature of this club and the expanse of Shea’s outfield to pitch deep into the game.

Unless Arroyo rediscovers his magic against the Mets, we’ll guess that Aaron Harang will be the toughest pitcher the Mets face this weekend. At 6’7″ and 275 pounds, he’s an imposing presence on the mound, and mixes a heavy fastball with a nasty slider, average changeup, and slow curve. He’s 9-2 this year, and somehow didn’t get one Cy Young vote last year despite tying for the NL lead in wins.

Game Four: Oliver Perez vs. Kyle Lohse

Perez is coming off the 15-day DL for what was termed back stiffness. However he made a successful rehab start on July 10th and is expected to be at full strength. Despite his svelte ERA, stingy WHIP, and excellent strikeout rate, Ollie is more or less a .500 pitcher — mainly because his mechanics and stuff are still either “on” or “off” from game to game. It’s time he took the bull by the horns and stepped up his rate of consistency — no better time than his first start of the second half.

Lohse has been an enigma since posting a 14-11 record in 2003 with the Twins, at times looking like an ace while other times a AAAA pitcher. His best pitch is a sharp-breaking overhand curve, and he can get his fastball into the low 90s. When he’s on, he can be outstanding — simply take a look at his last two starts before the break (two runs allowed in 16 innings). In addition, he can be a workhorse, so if he’s rolling don’t expect him to leave the game — he has two complete games this year including a shutout. In essence, he is the lefthanded version of Oliver Perez, circa 2006. His kryponite, though, is lefthanded batters, so the lefty-heavy lineup of the Mets could cause him some problems — particularly if his curve is not sharp.

Mets Bats

The lineup appeared to be coming out of its month-long slump right before the break, so we’ll see what carries over. We certainly hope that Carlos Delgado can continue to build on his fine finish to the first half.

Though there hasn’t been any official word on who the Mets’ batting coach will be now that Rick Down has been let go, we’re going to assume that both Howard Johnson and Rickey Henderson will have a strong influence on the bats. We can only hope that the Mets hitters listen to (and can decipher) the pearls of wisdom flowing from Rickey, perhaps the greatest on-base guy in the history of the game. The Mets’ biggest issues at the plate this year are directly related to overaggressiveness, an inability to decipher the strike zone, and the discipline to wait for one’s pitch. In contrast, those were all of Rickey’s strengths as a player. Though it’s doubtful we’ll see any sweeping changes in the Mets’ offense right away, maybe we’ll see some of the building blocks of Rickey’s philosophy start to appear before this series is over.

Reds Machine

As a team, Cincinnati has struck out 640 times (over 100 of those are Dunn’s), trailing only Florida and San Diego for most in the NL. They are a free-swinging bunch to say the least, and Dunn is hardly the only longball threat. There’s this guy named Griffey who’s gone a yard more than a few times in his career, and Josh Hamilton has opened eyes with his Mickey Mantle impression thus far. Not to be forgotten are Brandon Phillips’ 17 homers, the 14 clouted by catcher David Ross, or the 13 by shortstop Alex Gonzalez. That makes six guys in the starting lineup with homerun totals in the double-digits, with Scott Hatteberg just a few away from joining the group, and the enigmatic Edwin Encarnacion always a threat to go deep.

However, the tater totals are a function of the cozy confines of Great American Ball Park — they’ve hit 80 homers in Cincinnati, and only 48 on the road. That said, we can hope that the deep alleys of Shea will keep some of those flyballs from finding the seats.

Overview

How this four-game series plays out could be indicative of where the Mets find themselves come October. After all, this Cincinnati squad is downtrodden, its hopes for the postseason completely dashed. In other words, it’s a team that the Mets should, and need to, beat — that is, if they’re interested in remaining at the top of the NL East. A split is a minimum requirement, but three out of four is the goal.

Posted in Series Previews | Comments Off on Series Preview: Mets vs. Reds

Inside Look: Cincinnati Reds

Cincinnati Reds baseball logoThe Mets are hosting the Cincinnati Reds at Shea for the first time in 2007, and since the New York media doesn’t let much word in regarding teams west of the Meadowlands, we’re counting on the Reds’ beat writer C. Trent Rosecrans of The Cincinnati Post to give us the scoop.

Don’t worry, we’ll still be getting the perspective of the Reds fan later in the day, from one of the top Cincinnati baseball blogs.

Until then, here is a Q&A with C.Trent:

1. At 36-52 and 13 games behind, it looks like it’s going to be a long second-half for the Reds. After a strong showing in 2006, was there any way to see this coming?

Last year’s team overachieved and put some expectations on this year’s team, which still, on paper is better than last year’s. This year’s team has underachieved. Just look at the Pythagorean W-L. This year it’s 41-47 — not great, but still about how good they are. Last year’s was 76-86 but the real record was 80-82. So, this year they’re underachieving by five games and last year overachieved by four. They’re somewhere around there in the middle. And, the bullpen was always tenuous — but it’s just been bad pretty much every time out, which has hurt.


2. The Philadelphia Daily News is reporting that nearly the entire Reds roster is available for trade. Is that true, and if so, who are the most likely players to be dealt?

Oh, just about everyone is available — but there’s a price. I think Dunn’s contract and Griffey’s injury history will make them tougher to trade than everyone hopes. I don’t see them getting the asking price for either of those two guys. Most likely to get dealt will be some of the veterans — Scott Hatteberg, Jeff Conine, David Weathers, Mike Stanton. They have track records and could help some teams. Hatteberg in particular could be a steal for a team looking for a 1st baseman. You know any teams that need one of those?

3. The Reds have been hit with multiple injuries throughout the season, and their pitching has been less than par. That said, did Jerry Narron deserve to get the blame?

No, but does the manager ever? It’s just the typical play from the playbook. It surprised no one.

4. Wayne Krivsky was awarded much of adulation after a Reds resurgence in 2006. Does HE take the blame for the failures (so far) of 2007?

Some are putting it on him, but after so much turnover from the GM spot in the last couple of years (Krivsky in his second year, O’Brien just had two years here) that it would set the organization back to start over once again.

5. What does Krivsky — and the Reds — have to do to finish this season strong and renew the optimism for 2008? And, do you think there’s any chance of making a race of it this year, in the weak NL Central?

No. 13 games isn’t impossible, but there are five teams they’d have to jump. That’s not happening. But if they play .500 ball the rest of the way, there could be some guarded optimism for next season.


6. A bright spot: the Josh Hamilton story has been wonderful to watch. Will we get to see the phenom this weekend, or is his wrist injury going to keep him out?

We’ll see. Hamilton had a cast on Sunday and is going to get it off tomorrow (Thursday) and have it reexamined. We’ll see.

7. How much of an impact did Narron’s relationship with him have on Hamilton’s success? Will Johnny Narron be kept on board?

Johnny and Jerry Narron are baseball guys and understand the business of baseball. Johnny knows Josh needs him more than Jerry does. So Johnny keeps coming in and putting on the uniform. Johnny and Josh have become very close, and Johnny will be around in some capacity for a while. Narron’s relationship helped early, as Narron said Hamilton would get a chance to play every day in spring training and he’d stick with him even if he started 0-for-80. Well, that didn’t happen and Hamilton’s talent took over. And here we are.


8. Does Ken Griffey retire a Red? Will the Cincinnati fans miss him if he leaves?

Two very, very interesting questions. Griffey said in Seattle that he wanted to retire a Mariner. But, he could still play his last game as a Red and then officially retire as Mariner — a la Emmitt Smith and the Cardinals/Cowboys. Junior — a big Cowboys fan — even said, “like Emmitt” when he talked about retiring as a Mariner. Griffey won’t play in a Reds uniform past 2008. I think the season he’s having has rejuvenated him a little. I think he seriously thought he’d retire after next season, but now I think he may be rethinking that. As for the fans of Cincinnati? Some will really miss him and some won’t. The expectations put upon him here were just too high when he came in 2000. Anything short of seven World Series titles wasn’t going to be enough for Reds fans.

Thanks again to C. Trent for his invaluable insight. Be sure to check out his blog at the Cincinnati Post — he’s clearly one of a handful of baseball beat writers who “gets” this blog thing.

Posted in Series Previews | Comments Off on Inside Look: Cincinnati Reds

Midseason Analysis: Aaron Heilman

[TABLE=17]

It wasn’t so long ago that Aaron Heilman was “too valuable” to be moved out of the bullpen and into the starting rotation — despite his desire to be a starter. Now, there’s question as to whether he has any value as a reliever, and no one’s considering that he be transitioned anywhere — except, perhaps, to New Orleans.

Though Heilman’s 2006 was up and down, for the most part he was highly effective in his middle relief / setup relief role, and was counted on to continue bridging the eighth inning toward Billy Wagner in the absence of Duaner Sanchez in 2007. Unfortunately, things haven’t worked out well, as Heilman is gradually being pushed out of setup relief and into the middle innings.

His inconsistency has been frustrating, to say the least, especially to those who witnessed his remarkable work in 2005 and down the stretch in 2006. It’s possible he’s not 100% returned from minor elbow surgery executed immediately after the 2006 season, though it seems more likely that he’s simply not fit to be an everyday reliever. His best work has been performed with judicious rest between appearances, and his mechanics break down considerably (low elbow at release point, pushing the ball with fingers underneath) as he pitches more frequently. Nonetheless, Willie Randolph continues to trot him out there on a nearly daily basis — pulling a page from the Joe Torre book, How to Burn Out a Bullpen.

There was a time when Heilman was a genuinely reliable reliever — the kind of guy you could count on most of the time. This year, he’s become the Braden Looper of the middle innings — causing you to sit on the edge of your seat, fingers crossed, hoping to the baseball gods he’ll get through the inning unscathed. The homerun ball has been a major bugaboo, seemingly carried over from Yadier Molina’s bomb in the NLCS. In truth, the homeruns have nothing to do with a mental issue — the problem is his previously devastating changeup is usually high, flat, and fat.

Second-half Outlook

As long as Aaron’s arm angle continues to drop, he will not be an effective pitcher — reliever, starter, or otherwise (though maybe in softball). Since the low release point is most likely tied to fatigue, the only hope for him is to be used less frequently — which is only a possibility if the Mets can find another effective reliever somewhere. Trouble is, Randolph hasn’t yet put together the fact that the more he pitches, the worse he pitches — he’s on pace to pitch in more games than last year’s career high of 74 appearances. That said, expect similar inconsistency in the second half, and hope that someone has the sense to move him back into a starting role before spring training 2008.

Posted in Player Notes | 8 Comments

Midseason Analysis: Pedro Feliciano

[TABLE=16]

As a result of the signing of Scott Schoeneweis, Pedro Feliciano was pushed to the far side of the bullpen in spring training, and some pundits did not even include him in their “projected” rosters during the preseason. Despite his fairly successful 2006, Feliciano was considered by some to be an extra luxury — he’d be a usable LOOGY while Schoeneweis would likely grab most of the lefthanded innings not handed to Billy Wagner.

It’s safe to say things don’t always turn out according to plan.

While Feliciano had a strong 2006, his 2007 has been sensational. The lefty sidewinder with the loopy slider has been getting all the big outs Schoeneweis was supposed to manage, and extinguishing the fires Chad Bradford used to put out. He’s been equally adept against lefties and righties, limiting lefthanded swingers to a miniscule .106 batting average and one extra-base hit in 48 at-bats. More importantly, he’s extended his role from LOOGY to full-inning man, and slowly emerging as the Mets’ most reliable setup reliever.

Second-half Outlook

Feliciano is on the pitcher’s version of a hot streak, and the only question is, can he keep it going? Since this is only his third year of sidearm slinging, there’s reason to believe he’s only now getting the hang of it, and may yet reach his peak. After pitching in 104 games over this year and last, the element of surprise is no longer on his side — so his effectiveness has to have something to do with skill.

Naturally, there’s no reason to expect him to continue with his superhuman effort — he’s due to have a few bad outings eventually — but over the course of the last 70 or so games, he should remain one of the most effective arms coming out of the Mets’ bullpen. Lord knows they need him to be, with the inconsistencies of Schoeneweis, Aaron Heilman, and Guillermo Mota making the relief corps the team’s biggest question mark.

Posted in Player Notes | 2 Comments

Midseason Analysis: Scott Schoeneweis

[TABLE=15]

First-half Analysis

Here’s the story. After a mediocre career as a starter, Schoeneweis is transitioned to the bullpen, first as a mop-up man, then as a LOOGY. He has moderate success, though nothing to write home about, until the American League catches on to his run-of-the-mill repertoire of a straight fastball and so-so secondary stuff. After eight years in the AL, he finds his way to Cincinnati and enjoys immediate success against National League batters who’ve never seen him before — amassing two wins and three saves in 16 meaningless September games.

Based on those whopping 14 innings, and a questionable scouting report from Johnny Damon (OK, they probably didn’t ask Damon for his take), the Mets sign Scott Schoeneweis to a 3-year, $11M contract, and expect him to step into their bullpen as not just a LOOGY, but a potential setup man.

Willie Randolph bought into the idea, saying as much during spring training. To hear Willie tell it, he was counting on “The Show” to regularly eat up seventh and eighth innings — go 2-3 innings when necessary — and maybe even close a few games. And he pitched fairly well at the start of the season — right up to the first week of May. Then the wheels fell off.

Interestingly, his performance went downhill immediately following his 17th appearance. Looking at last years 16 games with the Reds, maybe that’s his quota for success in a season.

Also of note, Schoeneweis has pitched startlingly better on the road (1.04 ERA) than at home (9.53 ERA). Is that a freak stat, or is there a mental issue (i.e., the Whitson Factor)?

Second-half Outlook

Roger Clemens has a clause in his contract stating that he does not have to travel with the team to away games. Perhaps the Mets could look into extending the reverse for Schoeneweis — instead of being with the team at Shea, he can continue right on down to his hometown of Long Branch, NJ, until the Mets set off on their next road trip.

The Show’s velocity is down by 3-4 MPH from last year — a significant drop for someone with below-average command and flat movement — yet he insists his leg issue is not affecting his performance.

At this point, we hope that Randolph realizes that The Show is fairly worthless except as a limited-use LOOGY and for occasional mop-up duty. He’s holding lefties to a .222 average but righties are hammering him at a .333 clip, including 5 HRs, 7 doubles, 1 triple, and 17 RBI in 78 at-bats. Why Willie has had him face more righties than lefties this year is beyond the realm of reason.

Can Scott Schoeneweis offer something to the Mets in the second half? Maybe — but only exclusively against lefthanded hitters. Randolph must put an end to this hope-against-hope that he can eat up innings — it’s time to adjust the plan.

Posted in Player Notes | 2 Comments

Midseason Analysis: Joe Smith

[TABLE=14]

This time last year, Joe Smith was toiling in the bullpen of the Brooklyn Cyclones, the lowest rung of professional baseball, only weeks after attending college classes. Now, he’s counted on to get big outs in the biggest media circus of Major League Baseball.

The way he goes about his business is similar to his surname — unremarkable, unassuming — just a regular “Joe”. That unflappability and cool-as-a-cucumber mentality befit his role as a late-inning reliever.

Smith came out of nowhere to win a bullpen spot out of spring training, and was an instant success, unnerving some of the best bats in the National League with his laredo release point. He did not give up a run in his first 17 appearances, striking out sluggers and inducing ground balls in key situations.

Since that Superman-like start, Smith hasn’t been quite as invincible, as teams are becoming more familiar with his arm angle and repertoire. Still, he’s gained the confidence of manager Willie Randolph — no small feat for a youngster with his lack of professional experience. His ability to keep the ball down has resulted in a remarkable 3:1 groundball/flyball ratio, and he’s allowed just two homeruns in 36 innings. In addition to the groundball prowess, he’s also something of a strikeout artist, deftly using his fadeaway change and slashing slider to amass nearly one K per inning. At this point, his main issue is control — he’s walked 18, which isn’t bad, but isn’t great either. Generally, he has specific outings with control problems — he’ll go four or five appearances without a walk, then suddenly walk two in an inning. Also, he’s recently been allowing too many inherited runners to score.

Second-half Outlook

As Smith showed effectiveness, Randolph continually placed him into impossible situations — so the inherited runs scoring is more a result of the odds finally going against him than a lack of performance. You can’t put a guy into first-and-second and bases-loaded situations time after time and not expect him to crack at some point.

Some of his early success could have been attributed to his mystery, but he’s faced most of the NL East teams more than once and continued to be effective. Still, the NL will eventually find a vulnerability, and it will be interesting to see how he adjusts.

His stuff is the real deal, and he will continue to be a strong option for the sixth and seventh innings of winnable ballgames. He’ll be more effective, though, if Willie learns to manage him more sensibly. For example, his ERA is 0.55 when pitching with one days’ rest, 5.68 with two days’ rest and 4.55 with no rest. Righties are hitting only .211 against him, but lefties are nearly .300. Clearly he’s best as a matchup guy — a ROOGY — but should be fine throwing a full inning (vs lefties and righties) so long as he’s given a day to recover. Of course, Willie feels the need to use every arm available, every single game, if he deems necessary, so the idea of proper management is more pie-in-the-sky wishful thinking than anything else.

Posted in Player Notes | Comments Off on Midseason Analysis: Joe Smith

Midseason Analysis: Billy Wagner

[TABLE=13]

First-half Analysis

This year, Billy Wagner has been everything we always hoped he’d be — a lights-out, no nonsense closer who ends games without a hint of concern, slamming the door on opposing teams before they even knock. In short, the exact opposite of every other closer in Mets history.

Yes, he still has issues in non-save situations, losing his focus on occasion and fooling around with batters instead of going right after them. No biggie, because his job is to get the saves, and he’s done that with remarkable consistency — unless you feel that 17 out of 18 isn’t good enough.

Second-half Outlook

Last year, “Country Time” had finger issues that affected his throwing well into midseason — though he refused to use it as an excuse for his inconsistency. This year, he’s completely healthy, and we’re seeing the “real” Billy Wagner — and his velocity is going up as the season progresses. There’s no reason to believe he’ll be anything other than an elite closer in the second half.

Posted in Player Notes | 2 Comments

Midseason Analysis: Orlando Hernandez

[TABLE=12]

First-half Analysis

For the majority of his starts, El Duque has been brilliant, mixing speeds and pitches and arm angles with great success in keeping batters guessing and off-balance. On occasion he’s had forgettable outings — usually tied directly to the sharpness of his bread-and-butter overhand curve.

Second-half Outlook

As is always the question with Orlando Hernandez — can he stay healthy? He’s pitching above and beyond what anyone expected this year, but we’d be fine with a level lower if we knew he’d take his turn every five days. Let’s face it, he was brought on this team to win in the postseason, and anything he can give beyond a .500 record in the regular season is gravy.

While the Mets will need him to solidify a spot in the starting rotation in the second half — especially considering the ailments of Oliver Perez and Jorge Sosa, the main concern is to make sure he’s healthy in September and beyond, when the games may be most meaningful. That’s the stage where El Duque shines and prospers. In other words, no more jogging in the outfield.

Posted in Player Notes | Comments Off on Midseason Analysis: Orlando Hernandez