Dirty Goes Down

As you’ve likely heard by now, Duaner Sanchez has a hairline fracture that will require immediate surgery. He’ll be out for, in all probability, the entire year. Best case scenario, he is able to start throwing by mid-August. Obviously, this is a tremendous blow to the Mets’ plan for winning.

With Sanchez gone, the Mets have an immediate need for a solid setup man to tandem with Aaron Heilman. Previously, it was assumed they’d be able to hold the fort with an array of arms while waiting for Dirty to return. Some mixture of Scott Schoeneweis, Chan Ho Park, Joe Smith, etc., would fill the gap until late April, when Duaner would come riding in on his white horse and solidify the bridge to Billy Wagner. Now, however, the Mets must think long-term for a replacement.

Interesting … at the opening of spring training, the starting rotation looked like a disaster and the bullpen a glowing strength. At the close of spring training, the situation is almost exactly opposite.

It wasn’t supposed to happen this way. Jon Adkins was supposed to add valuable arm to the middle relief corps. Juan Padilla was supposed to come back from Tommy John surgery early. Ambiorix Burgos was supposed to challenge for a setup spot. Joe Smith was supposed to impress, but start the season in AAA. Pedro Feliciano was supposed to fight for the last spot on the staff. There was supposed to be so much depth in the bullpen that the Mets brass might consider putting Aaron Heilman back in the rotation, to shore up the weakest link on the team.

Instead, we’re about to hit the panic button, as gopher ball artist Chan Ho Park is asked to convert from starter to setup man in seven days. Scary.

What are the possibilities of life without Duaner? Here they are, in no particular order:

1. Park, Schoeneweis, etc., band together as a makeshift unit and do a mediocre to acceptable job until Guillermo Mota comes off his 50-game suspension. In this situation, Mota must come back and pitch the same way he did in September of last year, sans steroids. That may be too much to ask.

2. Park immediately takes to his new role as setup man, and forgets how to give up homerun balls at an alarming rate.

3. Schoeneweis establishes himself as more than just a LOOGY, and proves to be a viable option as setup man.

4. Joe Smith continues pushing forward, and not only makes people forget Chad Bradford, but Sanchez becomes a memory as well.

5. Aaron Heilman takes two cortisone shots a week for his balky elbow, and breaks Mike Marshall’s record of 104 appearances in a season.

6. Philip Humber shakes the nervousness that plagued him in March, and forces Mike Pelfrey to the bullpen. Pelfrey becomes a force similar to Heilman in the late innings, and no longer needs to worry about secondary pitches.

7. Juan Padilla is fully recovered by early May, and picks up right where he left off in 2005.

8. Ambiorix Burgos miraculously locates the strike zone, and becomes useful as both a setup man and occasional closer when Wagner needs rest.

9. Jorge Sosa calls Leo Mazzone and rediscovers the magic that made him 13-3 in 2005.

10. The Joe Hietpas Experiment produces results more quickly than anyone imagined, and he’s inserted into Dirty’s role in late April.

The above scenarios are most unlikely, though some are not too far from reality. In truth, the key candidates for the setup role are Park, Burgos, and Padilla. Schoeneweis might be a consideration, but only for the short term, as his real value is as a matchup guy. His less than mediocre success against righthanded batters will become glaring over an extended period in 8th inning situations. On the other hand, Joe Smith might have enough stuff to get out batters on both sides of the plate, but Willie Randolph will likely be more comfortable using him in 6th inning spots for at least the first half of the year — similar to the way he handled ChadBrad in 2006.

The recent turn of events could have been a boon for Jon Adkins or Jorge Sosa, but both have been so awful they can’t be considered. Adkins has been so hittable and unimpressive, the only thing keeping him in camp has been Sanchez’s absence and his lack of options. Sosa has finally been assigned to AAA. Good thing, as the Mets were losing too many baseballs over the far fences.

If Padilla can avoid any more setbacks, and pitch the way he did two years ago, then Sanchez will hardly be missed. Unfortunately, those are two huge ifs. Not out of the question, but difficult to count on. The “ifs” surrounding Guillermo Mota are just as questionable, and he won’t be available for the first third of the season. Clearly, it comes down to rolling the dice on Chan Ho Park or Burgos.

Park is an alarming option. Even as a successful starter in his years with the Dodgers, he was susceptible to the gopher ball — while pitching in the vast confines of Chavez Ravine. This spring his numbers were decent, but may have been horrendous had it not been for strong wind gusts that blew a few taters back into the playing field. However, as a one-inning guy he won’t need to throw all four pitches; maybe if he concentrates on using only his best two — like Heilman does with his sinker and changeup — he’ll be more effective and won’t give up as many long balls. Unfortunately, he only has a week to make the transformation.

Looking solely on ceiling, Ambiorix Burgos is the best candidate to fill Duaner’s shoes. However, he has so far been unable to harness his electric stuff, and also been bitten by the long ball — despite those gusty winds. He’s still standing on the kitchen table, jumping up and trying to reach that ceiling. And that kitchen might be in New Orleans in a few days.

The next few days will be telling, to say the least. Maybe Park will be able to take the bull by the horns and flourish in his new role. Darren Oliver made a remarkable transformation last year, though it was in a much less pressurized role. Or perhaps Park, Smith, and Schoeneweis can perform at an acceptable level until Mota arrives in late May / early June. Don’t rule out the possibility of Omar making a move — though it would seem nearly impossible to find a quality bullpen arm when everyone in baseball is looking for the exact same thing. Perhaps the Indians would be interested in Ben Johnson, and be willing to give up Roberto Hernandez … ha ha

Five days till Opening Day …

Posted in Pitching Staff, Spring Training 2007 | Comments Off on Dirty Goes Down

Pitching Shaping Up

The bulk of the pitching questions have been answered, though things didn’t turn out quite the way everyone planned.

Yesterday, Willie Randolph anointed Mike Pelfrey as “one of my guys”, which is Williespeak for “Pelfrey is the number-five starter”. Pelfrey will follow Tom Glavine, Orlando Hernandez, John Maine, and Oliver Perez in the starting rotation.

Also over the weekend, Chan Ho Park was abruptly told that he’ll be a setup reliever, sharing the eighth-inning duties with Aaron Heilman. Park was visibly upset with the news, and did not immediately embrace the idea. So now we have two guys who don’t want to be in the bullpen, responsible for the second-most-important relief job on the team.

With Pelfrey tagged as the fifth starter, and Jorge Sosa grooving chest-high fastballs, it appears that Aaron Sele will be the long man / this year’s Darren Oliver. Finally, it seems certain that Joe Smith has taken Chad Bradford’s ROOGY role, with Ambiorix Burgos probably starting the year in New Orleans.

Initially, we thought Park or Sele would keep Pelfrey in AAA for at least the first few months, and Duaner Sanchez would be recovered and ready to resume his setup role. And if Sanchez wasn’t 100%, we thought for sure that flamethrower Burgos or Juan Padilla would step up to take the job until Dirty was ready. Burgos, however, isn’t quite ready, and Padilla had a setback in his recovery from Tommy John surgery.

So here is what the pitching staff will most likely look like on April 1:

Glavine
El Duque
Maine
Perez
* Pelfrey
Sele
Schoeneweis
Smith
Feliciano
Park
Heilman
Wagner

Pelfrey probably won’t join the roster until mid-April, as the Mets won’t need a fifth starter until then. There has been a lot of speculation that Lastings Milledge will take the 25th roster spot for the first two weeks, then go down to AAA when Pelfrey comes up. However, that makes little sense, as much as people would like to see Milledge on the club. As has been stated several times by both Omar Minaya and Randolph, Milledge will play every day, wherever he is. With Shawn Green penciled in as the starting rightfielder, Milledge’s starting job is in New Orleans. In the first two weeks of the season, the Mets will need an extra arm more than they’ll need an extra outfielder.

Though the starting pitchers have been stretched out in Florida, that doesn’t mean they’ll be ready to go 6-7 innings in the damp and cold April weather in the Northeast. And with Willie’s strategy of changing pitchers like it’s the seventh game of the World Series, compounded by the absences of Dirty Sanchez and Guillermo Mota, it would seem that the full 12-man staff would be necessary, even if it doesn’t include a fifth starter.

First of all, it’s doubtful the Mets are 100% sold on the idea of Park in a setup role. When he had success in the past, he relied heavily on a mid-90s fastball and a sharp curveball. He now throws in the high 80s/low 90s, his curveball is inconsistent, and his other pitches — changeup and slider — are much less effective as his velocity decreases. Chan Ho’s biggest problem has been keeping the ball in the park, and the strong winds blowing in — rather than his stuff — made his most recent appearance successful. Further, though he’s pitched some relief in the past, it’s never been in a role that required him to be ready every day. So we have no idea whether he’ll be able to pitch on back-to-back days, nor if he has the mental makeup to come in and close the door in the seventh and eighth innings.

Initially, Willie may go with Scott Schoeneweis as the setup man on Heilman’s “off” days, while Park gets physically accustomed to pitching every day. (Personally, I’d be just as comfortable with Joe Smith in the 8th, rather than Park — but it’s pretty clear that his job will be the handling 6th and 7th inning situations.) With Park getting conditioned for one-inning spurts, and Schoeneweis penciled in for a setup role, that leaves Sele as the lone long man. This wouldn’t appear to be a problem, until you remember that both El Duque and Oliver Perez could easily be out of ballgames by the fourth inning. We’d like to think optimistically, but the fact is that both of those guys are a crapshoot every time they go on the mound — a 3-hit shutout is just as likely as a third-inning exit. If they both implode in the same week, the bullpen will be severely taxed — though in that case the Mets would certainly summon an arm from AAA.

Even if Park does slide right into the setup role, and the Mets aren’t in need of excessive long relief, I still see Willie bringing seven relievers north, for two reasons. First, Aaron Heilman’s elbow tendinitis has to be a concern — we’d assume that Willie will be hesitant to use him on back-to-back days right away. Secondly, there are three pitchers still on the bubble: Jorge Sosa, Ambiorix Burgos, and Jon Adkins. Their fates may well be sealed within the next few days, but if not, the Mets may want to bring one of them north. Adkins has no options, and will have to be released outright. However, he did have a solid 2006 as a middle reliever in San Diego, so the Mets may want to hold on to him as trade bait. With several teams desperate for bullpen help (read: every MLB team), it may be worthwhile to trade Adkins for a low-level minor leaguer, rather than let him go for nothing. If that trade doesn’t happen before camp breaks, it may be possible in the first week of the season. Similarly, Jorge Sosa might have trade value, and may not accept a minor league demotion. Again, if a trade can’t be worked out earlier, it might be worth keeping him around and then dealing him before Pelfrey returns.

The most intriguing arm in camp is Burgos, and the Mets may want to handle him similarly to Jorge Julio last year. In other words, keep him with the big club, which offers him the opportunity to be educated by Rick Peterson and Guy Conti. With an open roster spot, it may be more beneficial, in the long run, for Burgos to get an extra two weeks under the Jacket’s guidance, mixed in with a few confidence-building appearances, rather than send him immediately to New Orleans.

What ends up happening will be clear in the next few days — possibly highlighted by a last-minute trade. Until then, a few questions remain unanswered. All in all, the Mets’ pitching staff looks — on paper — to be strong enough to get through late May, at which point Duaner Sanchez, Guillermo Mota, and possibly Dave Williams could be ready to contribute.

Posted in Pitching Staff, Spring Training 2007 | Comments Off on Pitching Shaping Up

Anna Benson Sets Mets Straight

Sorry, I couldn’t resist …

There’s at least one legitimate reason for a Mets fan to pickup the latest copy of Penthouse magazine — to read Anna Benson’s opinion of the Mets.

No, I haven’t read the article, but did find excessive enjoyment from this excerpt as published in the Daily News:

“They got a —- bag of balls for Kris. They didn’t get —-. Julio Jorge (sic) and John Maine. They traded a number-one stud pitcher who was 30 at the time, and they blame the red dress….If I were a Mets fan, I’d be beside myself.”

Wow. Talk about open mouth, insert foot. Great timing, Anna !

In Anna’s defense, the article was likely written months before that number-one stud blew out his shoulder. But I don’t think any Mets fan is unhappy with the final result of the Kris Benson deal — John Maine and Orlando Hernandez (by way of Jorge Julio).

The brilliant Anna went so far as to say “You look at all the injuries they had with Pedro (Martinez) and beyond, and you know Kris would have taken them to the top last season.”

Um … yeah … riiiiiiiiiiiiiight …….

Well I guess the Mets can always sign Kris this winter — at a bargain rate — if he really is that much of a stud.

Posted in Spring Training 2007 | Comments Off on Anna Benson Sets Mets Straight

Milledge Making Things Difficult

Lastings Milledge was supposed to come in to camp and work on honing some of his raw skills, both athletic and social. He was expected to begin showing better strike zone judgment, fielding ability, and baserunning instincts as the spring wore on. It was hoped that a positive spring, aided by the tutelage of people like Rickey Henderson, would go a long way in furthering his development when he started the season in AAA New Orleans. Maybe, with a strong start in ‘Nawlins, Milledge could polish his skills to the point where he’d be a contributor to the 2007 Mets — perhaps as early as the second half of the season.

At the same time, Shawn Green came into camp armed with an epiphany in regard to his power outage of the past few years. He had found a mechanical flaw in his swing, and would have it corrected in the six weeks of spring training. By the end of March, Green would be swinging circa 2002, when he blasted 42 home runs in a Dodger uniform. Things would be looking very good at the bottom of the Mets order with the return of Shawn Green as a power threat.

However, things have not quite turned out as has been hoped. Though Green has made adjustments to his swing, the immediate rewards have not been realized in spring training games. He insists that he’s feeling better, and more confident, and Willie Randolph points to his BP sessions as evidence of Green’s improvement and legitimate reason for optimism. Unfortunately, for outsiders, the proof is in the pudding of spring training stats, and Shawn’s are dismal — a .163 batting average with 2 homeruns in 49 at-bats. Those numbers are more glaring when one looks at what Lastings Milledge has put up over the same time frame — his .370 average is second only to the red-hot Jose Reyes. The stark contrast in statistics between the two players has many, many people calling for a change in the guard.

But does that really make sense? In some ways, maybe, in others, maybe not.

First of all, spring training numbers don’t mean much — as much as we’d like them to. Sure, Shawn Green is batting .163, but Carlos Delgado is hitting only .200, Paul LoDuca is at .185, and Moises Alou is struggling at .171. Since Mike DeFelice is batting almost 30 points higher, and is light years better defensively, does that mean he should be starting in front of LoDuca? Should Julio Franco’s .333 average unseat Delgado at first base? Of course not. And if we’re going purely by the numbers, why is it Green, and not Alou, who is on the hot seat? Alou is over 40 years old, possibly worse in the field (yes, it’s possible), and injury prone.

Further to the point of dismissing spring training stats, consider the following. Last spring, Josh Phelps led the Detroit Tigers with a .531 average, blasting 32 total bases in only 15 games. Phelps did not make the team, and spent all of 2006 in AAA. Perhaps a better comparison is Brian Anderson, who won the centerfield job with the White Sox on the strength of a .309 average last spring. He ended up the regular season batting .225. Similarly, up-and-coming prospect Brandon Watson seemed to have a bead on a job on the Washington Nationals roster after a .300 spring, but spent most of the year shuffled back and forth from the minors to the majors, and was eventually traded to the Reds.

More to the point, former Mets Joe McEwing and Doug Mientkiewicz both hit over .430 for the Royals last spring, while their teammate Angel Berroa blistered the ball at a .450 clip. McEwing spent the year in AAA (for Houston), Mientkiewicz was let go at the end of the year, and Berroa finished at .234. The Royals, in fact, had the best numbers and the best record last spring — a stark contrast to their regular season performance.

If those examples aren’t near enough to Milledge’s situation, let’s take a look at Milledge last spring. He hit .327, initially sparking some to wonder if he might be ready for prime time. He wasn’t — at least, not indicated by his .241 MLB average. That same spring, Jose Valentin batted .143, looking much worse than Shawn Green does this year. Valentin, in fact, looked godawful right through the end of April — this blog was one of many calling for his release. Boy, were we wrong!

As much as people love to point to the stats, in the spring they may as well be meaningless — rarely showing any indication of how a player will do over the course of a 162-game season. That said, the best way to evaluate this competition between Green and Milledge is to look at their histories and their current skill sets, and try to make a logical decision on which player would add the most to the 2007 Mets.

Looking purely at their 2006 numbers, Green has a slight advantage. He hit 35 points higher, slugged 50 points higher, and got on base more (.344 OBP to Milledge’s .310). Green struck out at a lower rate, and scored more often (once every two games compared to Milledge’s one every four). The only place where Milledge beat Green was in RBI, as he drove in a run once every 7.5 at-bats compared to Green’s once every 8. Of course, there are a lot of problems with comparing the numbers, since Milledge only played in 56 games while Green played a full season. But one thing the stats do tell us, is that Milledge did not set the world on fire — and in fact did not even play near to the level of Green — even though Green is at the downside of his career.

Well, you say, Milledge was only 21, and he had rough times, and he wasn’t ready last year, so it isn’t a fair assessment nor comparison. That’s fine, but then why is he suddenly ready this year? He’s performing at about the same level this March as he did last March, so we can’t go by the spring numbers as an indication. His AAA numbers aren’t exactly awe-inspiring, either — in 300 at-bats, he had 7 homeruns, 36 RBI, .277 average, with a .388 OBP / .440 SLG / .828 OPS. A nice year, especially for a 21-year-old, but not necessarily something to get overly excited about. In fact, his .277 avg. and .828 OPS compared similarly to Green’s .283 / .777 — but Green did it at the MLB level. In an honest, by-the-numbers evaluation, there’s no reason to believe that Milledge will perform appreciably better than Green in 2007.

That is, unless you believe that Green is in a seriously rapid decline — the kind that effectively, and quickly, ended the careers of Dale Murphy and Robin Ventura, for example. However, the numbers don’t really predict a colossal collapse. While it’s true that Shawn Green’s power output has fallen dramatically in the last three years, his batting average has stayed around his career .280, and his strikeout rate has gone down. Some whisper that his issue is a slower bat, but Green contends it was a mechanical flaw related to a shoulder injury suffered in 2003. It makes sense .. though, it could be a combination of both mechanics and physical demise. In any case, if Green’s mechanical flaw is indeed corrected at some point between now and May, the Mets may have the best #7 hitter in the National League. While he may never hit 40 homeruns again, there’s no reason to doubt his ability to hit 25-30 — assuming he gets himself on track. Green is a notorious — and admitted — streak hitter. He’ll have 0-21 periods during the season, but he may also have the kind of hot streaks that make him the most feared hitter in the NL — Albert Pujols included. Mets fans may find this hard to believe, because they haven’t seen him at the top of his game. It’s a big “if”, but IF Shawn Green can find his stroke, and IF he gets hot, he’s a one-man wrecking machine.

Chances are, Green won’t return to that level of play. But, he has been there, has done that. It’s in him. It’s not unlike when the Mets suffered through the torturous beginning of Jose Valentin’s 2006 season. Why did they keep giving him chances, when he looked absolutely abysmal throughout spring training, and totally clueless in all of his pinch-hitting appearances? Because for a five-year period, he was one of the most productive shortstops in the AL not named A-Rod. The ability to succeed at this level of play requires more than pure skill — you also have to know how to make adjustments, how to read pitchers, and how to know yourself on a particular day. This all comes with experience — something Lastings Milledge doesn’t have (yet).

No one questions that Milledge’s raw skills are better than Shawn Green’s right now. But is that enough to justify pushing him into the starting lineup this year? For example, Milledge might run faster, but the raw speed doesn’t necessarily make him a better baserunner — nor a better fielder — than Green. As much as everyone likes to criticize Green’s fielding, Milledge’s — right now — are not appreciably better. (It reminds me of the 1980 Phillies, who used to bring in Lonnie Smith in the late innings as a defensive replacement for Greg Luzinski — did that REALLY make a whole lot of sense?) Milledge might have a quicker bat, but that doesn’t mean he’ll make more contact — or more productive outs. On the other hand, Green has already established that even if he doesn’t hit homeruns, he is capable of working deep counts, advancing runners, and executing the hit-and-run. Milledge is still learning these less exciting skills, but they are essential to winning. (Real baseball, played on a field, is much different from numbers-oriented fantasy baseball.) If Green is not hitting for power, or facing a tough pitcher, he can adjust his approach and his swing to make contact. Milledge, again, is still developing the ability to adjust. Milledge claims he has nothing to prove in the minors, but the fact is, he hit .277 in AAA last year. What has that proven?

Major League teams generally don’t expect a 22-year-old to emerge as a star — it’s a rarity. A few recent youngsters to burst on the scene at that tender age include David Wright, Albert Pujols, Hank Blalock, Joe Mauer, Rocco Baldelli, and Miguel Cabrera. However, all of those players showed previous indications of immediate success. Wright batted a hair under .300 at both the AAA and MLB level when he was 21; Mauer mashed at over .300 at every minor league stop, then hit .305 in his MLB cup of coffee at the age of 21; Blalock batted .307 in AAA as a 21-year-old, one year after hitting .380; Cabera hit .365 as a 20-year-old in AA, performed admirably later that year in the bigs and postseason, and hit .294 in MLB the next year. Rocco Baldelli forced himself onto a very bad Tampa Bay team as a 21-year-old after hitting .333, .371, and .292 at three minor league stops the year before. Pujols was a man-child and freak of nature that cannot be used as comparison in this situation. Even the player Milledge is most compared to — Gary Sheffield — had proven his point by demolishing AAA pitching at a .344 clip when he was only 19.

Comparatively, Milledge has shown promise at the A level, and through 48 games in AA when he hit .337, with 4 home runs, 24 RBI, and 11 stolen bases. Nice numbers, for sure, but hardly dominating. Certainly his .277 at Norfolk last year cannot be considered excellent. Why people see him as ready to start on a championship team now is hard to fathom. Will he be a star? Maybe. For certain it won’t be this year. In fact, he’ll likely continue to struggle. Until he proves he can handle pitching at a level higher than AA, it doesn’t make sense to rush him — not when there is a perfectly capable Shawn Green in his position, and especially not when all the other aspects of Milledge’s game still need to be honed. If Milledge proved to be an excellent fielder, and or an astute baserunner — something along the lines of Endy Chavez — then maybe you consider displacing Green with Milledge. But until he gets more at-bats in AAA, and improves his game overall, the best place for Lastings Milledge — and the Mets — on April 1 is New Orleans.

If, by June 1, Shawn Green still hasn’t found his stroke, and Lastings Milledge is tearing up AAA, then there’s a strong case for promotion. But not now.

Posted in Spring Training 2007 | Comments Off on Milledge Making Things Difficult

Down to the Wire

There are less than ten days left of spring training, and many issues have been addressed in Port St. Lucie over the last month. Still, though, there are burning questions yet to be answered — and may not be answered until the final days before the team heads north.

The exciting:

– Jose Reyes is making 2006 look like a warmup to what could be a monstrous offensive season in 2007

– Tom Glavine has looked in mid-season form since his first spring training start

– Oliver Perez and John Maine are fulfilling everyone’s expectations, carried by the momentum of their postseason success

– Mike Pelfrey looks like the real deal

– Joe Smith may make us forget all about Chad Bradford

The disappointing:

– Duaner Sanchez came into camp with the wrong attitude, and will now have a much longer road back to the 8th inning setup role

– After a surprisingly quick recovery, Juan Padilla had to be shut down, and will take a little longer to return from Tommy John surgery

– Chan Ho Park, Aaron Sele, and Jorge Sosa have shown nothing to earn a spot on the Mets roster — not to mention Alay Soler, whose status has already been established

The questions:

– Will Shawn Green ever hit again ?

– Can El Duque be counted on to start more than 20 games?

– Who among Ben Johnson, David Newhan, Damion Easley, and Lastings Milledge, will fill out the bench?

– With Sanchez off-track, Ambiorix Burgos not ready for prime-time, and Aaron Heilman suffering from elbow tendinitis, has the bridge to Billy Wagner become a weakness rather than a strength?

The outburst of Reyes would be the story of the spring, if the Mets did not have the cloud of pitching questions hovering over Port St. Lucie. Jose came in beefed up and, more importantly, with a much different approach at the plate. Gone are the days of swinging wildly at off-speed pitches, and reaching for balls in the dirt. The new Jose Reyes waits on pitches, lets the ball get deep before committing, and the result has been consistently long, quality at-bats. He’s seeing more pitches, and seeing them longer — much unlike the over-aggressive, free-swinger he’d been as recently as May of last year. While it’s true that Reyes learned to be more and more patient as the 2006 season wore on, it was more about taking pitches than seeing and waiting on pitches (there’s a difference). This spring, he’s staying back longer — a trait of the truly great hitters. Wade Boggs did it. Rod Carew did it. George Brett did it. Tony Gwynn did it. Now Reyes is learning to do it, and as a result he may find himself among those names someday in Cooperstown. For the here and now, his 5- and 6-pitch at-bats will result in an overall better performance by the entire Mets’ lineup, for several reasons. First, it’s going to result in at least 75 walks this year — a figure that seemed unfathomable less than a year ago. Second, it’s going to force the opposing starting pitcher to throw more pitches, inching him ever closer to the 100-pitch limit imposed on today’s moundsmen. Third, it gives the other eight hitters in the Mets’ order a chance to see most of what the pitcher has that particular day. Finally, it should also ignite a pattern of patience — a strategy that will wear down a starting pitcher earlier in the game, thus forcing the opponent to dip into their bullpen arms earlier than they might like. If Reyes continues his current approach into the regular season, and remains healthy, he may have the most exciting all-around year any player has had since Rickey Henderson’s 1990 MVP season.

As the Mets pitchers and catchers entered camp in mid-February, the big questions surrounded what looked to be a weak starting staff. By contrast, the bullpen looked to be again the team’s greatest strength, bolstered further by the additions of Scott Schoeneweis, Jon Adkins, Ambiorix Burgos, Juan Padilla, and others. What a difference a month makes!

At this point in time, the starting rotation looks to be more or less settled, as Glavine, Maine, and Perez have erased the doubt, and El Duque looks like, well, El Duque: a 57-year-old reincarnation of Satchel Paige who will have some health issues but otherwise make 20-25 starts and finish 10-8. Further, Mike Pelfrey’s brilliant spring may force him into the #5 spot, something he should be able to handle at this point in his career. Not a great rotation, but solid, dependable, and enough to complement the Mets’ offense. On the other hand, the Mets bullpen, which looked so deep a few weeks ago, is looking meek in comparison.

First, Duaner Sanchez came in overweight — both in the belly and in the head. His sudden streak of selfishness has cost the Mets a solid setup man for at least the month of April. Then Aaron Heilman was shut down with elbow tendinitis — a residual effect of his little-known offseason elbow surgery. These issues would not have been a big deal if Juan Padilla continued his amazing recovery, or Ambiorix Burgos could find the strike zone with his 100+ MPH heater, or if Jon Adkins or Jorge Sosa could look a little better than BP pitchers. However, all of those names are removed from the discussion, and Joe Smith has emerged as the reliever most likely to get important outs. Luckily, Heilman should be healthy enough to start the season, but without Sanchez to help, how long before the elbow issue flares up again — especially considering Willie Randolph’s strategy to manage every game like it’s the seventh game of the World Series?

Compared to the pitching issues, the offensive questions seem miniscule. While there’s a clamoring among fans to ditch Shawn Green and replace him with Lastings Milledge, in the end it really doesn’t matter which is in right field. Each has their negatives and positives, and regardless of who plays, they’ll be batting seventh in the lineup. Some day Milledge may put up great offensive numbers, but it’s not going to be in 2007. The best he’ll do is the worst that Green can accomplish, and neither player will be a difference-maker in the Mets’ drive to the pennant.

Similarly, the bench has competition, but will it really matter in the grand scheme of things? The Mets have some intriguingly skilled athletes being forced to compete with each other, while two relatively useless old men sit comfortably on the bench with guaranteed contracts. I love Julio Franco, but carrying a man of his limited skills on a National League roster in this day and age is an atrocity. Franco is a 7th-inning pinch-hitter — who needs a pinch-runner — and a weak option as a backup first baseman. If you say he’s capable of playing 2B and 3B, then I can see keeping him — but then why have the similarly limited Damion Easley as well? The final roster spot should come down to Easley vs. Franco, not the current situation of Ben Johnson vs. David Newhan. In fact, I’d even throw Anderson Hernandez into that mix. However it plays out on April 1 may not make a difference to the Mets’ position in the final standings. More likely, the bench will form similarly to the way it did last year: as a result of a combination of early-season injuries and promotions from AAA.

Ten days to Opening Day … the answers and decisions are coming quickly.

Posted in Spring Training 2007 | Comments Off on Down to the Wire

Pelfrey: Resist the Temptation

As spring training 1984 was about to break, manager Davey Johnson begged GM Frank Cashen to allow him to bring a young phenom hurler north. Cashen resisted, but eventually gave in to Johnson’s pleading.

From the New York Times:

Cashen was comparing this year’s spring phenomenon with the Mets’ prize pitcher of the 1981 camp. Leary, 22 at the time, made the team that year, over Cashen’s objections and pitched two major league innings before suffering an elbow injury that required three years of physical and emotional rehabilitation.

”Dwight Gooden does not have as good physical equipment as Tim Leary had in 1981,” Cashen said, ”but he’s a different kind of person. Adversity rolls off his back easier.”

(Ironically, Cashen believed Gooden had the proper emotional aptitude to handle the pressures of big league baseball. We know now that may have been the worst evaluation in Cashen’s otherwise brilliant career.)

This year, Mike Pelfrey is the phenom, and he is both similar to, and at the same time quite unlike, both Tim Leary and Dwight Gooden (and Tyler Yates, for that matter). Pelfrey has physical gifts and skills similar to those that Gooden and Leary exhibited in their early 20s, and he’s shown to have big-league-ready stuff. In contrast to Leary and Gooden, we assume Pelfrey is more stable and polished emotionally, based on four years of major college ball and a short stint with the Mets last year. In addition, he has the benefit of a strong support system instituted by the Mets after the gaffes of Gooden, Strawberry, and other youngsters rushed to the big stage. With Pelfrey’s outstanding performance this spring, and the Mets’ glaring need for frontline starting pitching, the temptation is great to bring Pelfrey north at the end of March — just as the Mets did with Gooden in ’84 and Leary in ’81.

My hope is that Willie Randolph, Omar Minaya, and the rest of the Mets’ brass resist the temptation.

The reason? Though the stuff is there, the head is there, and the Mets could really use a starter of his caliber, Mike Pelfrey is not ready for a 180-200 inning season. Last year, his first in pro ball, he pitched a grand total of 118 innings. In 2005, he threw 140 innings at Wichita State, the most he’d thrown in his life.

Compare those numbers to Dwight Gooden, who though only 19 years old in 1984, had already logged 191 innings at high-A Lynchburg the previous year. Leary had thrown 173 innings at AA Jackson the year before he was brought up — including 11 complete games. Back then, young pitchers weren’t coddled as much as they are today — and by young I’m talking from high school, on. In fact, quite the opposite; pitchers threw more, and as a result built up strength. Gooden, for example, probably threw somewhere around 50-90 innings as a high school senior in 1982, then another 80 in A ball after getting drafted. Coaches weren’t worried about pitch counts in those days, and it was acceptable — if not expected — for a 20-year-old to throw 180-220 innings without an issue.

In the past 10-15 years, however, things have changed drastically. Coaches and parents watch pitch counts from Little League on, and the best pitchers are limited most strictly, for fear of injury. This makes sense for growing boys, who could possibly damage their growth plates in the early teens. However, the result is that when they make it to the pros, pitchers are not ready for a professional season’s full load. The Mets organization is fully conscious of this fact, and limit their young pitchers to specific pitch counts — by game and by inning. For example, no pitcher in the Mets’ minor league system is allowed to throw more than 35 pitches in an inning. If they reach that point, they’re out of the game, regardless of the score. Similarly, there are limits for pitchers per game, depending on their age and experience.

Now, consider that a starting pitcher on a Major League team is expected to start at least 30 games, and average around 6 innings. In other words, a minimum of 180 innings. Again, Pelfrey threw 118 innings last year, mostly fastballs. In college, he threw 140 in 2005, 115 in 2004, and 105 in 2003. You don’t need to crunch the numbers to see that asking Mike Pelfrey to throw 180+ innings in 2007 is too much — but just for the record, a full 180-inning year would be 48% more load over last year, and 29% heavier than he’s ever executed in his life. Now add in another caveat: this year, Pelfrey will be throwing more breaking pitches — specifically a slider. It has been surmised by authorities such as the NPA, Baseball Prospectus, and Dr. James Andrews, that the slider takes more of a toll on the arm than a fastball or changeup. Also, add in the fact that all but 21 of Pelfrey’s innings were pitched in AA — where he might have had the ability to “let up” occasionally. In MLB, every pitch counts, so there is a higher stress factor (physically and mentally).

There’s no question the Mets need a pitcher like Pelfrey in 2007. At the same time, Mike Pelfrey should be a big part of what the Mets do in 2008 and well beyond. Can Pelfrey handle 48% more innings than he threw last year? Maybe. It’s quite possible he’ll have no problem pitching 175-190 innings this year — but will it affect what he does in 2008? Several young pitchers in the past have had awful second years after being overloaded in their rookie season. We’ll see what happens with Justin Verlander this year, who had a similar overload going from 2005-2006. Perhaps Mike Pelfrey has the biological make-up to easily handle an extra 60-70 innings, and won’t be affected at all. But is it worth the chance? All one has to do is peek into the Mets’ past, specifically the early 1990s, when Jason Isringhausen, Bill Pulsipher, and Paul Wilson were rushed to the big leagues, gracing the cover of Sports Illustrated as “Generation K”.

Assuming Mike Pelfrey continues to impress this spring, he’ll help the Mets in 2007. However, why does his 2007 have to start in New York? The Mets won’t need a fifth starter until mid-April, and can get by with fill-ins through the end of May. In the meantime, start Pelfrey in New Orleans — at the back end of the rotation. Skip him a few starts here and there, and limit his innings and pitch counts strictly in April, but then gradually work him up to 6-7 innings per start at the end of May. By mid June, he should have 10-12 starts under his belt, but only about 50-60 innings. At this point in the Mets’ season, they’ll be around the 60-70-game point, and involved in interleague play. Depending on what’s going on with the standings, maybe you bring him up for interleague, or maybe you wait until the end of the month, and start him against the Cardinals and/or the Phillies. He’ll be fresh, strong, and ready to take his turn every fifth day. This means he’d be available for about 16-20 starts and 90-120 innings. His total output for the year, then, would be somewhere between 140-180 innings (before the postseason!) — with a decent chunk of those at the lower-intensity, AAA level.

In a perfect world, that’s how I’d move Mike Pelfrey along — and Philip Humber as well. Of course, we know what happens to the best laid plans — they often fall astray. A stiff neck by El Duque, a string of bad outings by Oliver Perez, combined with a dogfight for first place, may make Pelfrey’s presence more urgent. But that’s why Chan Ho Park, Aaron Sele, Jorge Sosa, and Jason Vargas are around — to keep the seat warm for when Pelfrey and/or Humber are ready. Should all four of the stopgaps prove incompetent, and one of the top four falter (or suffer injury), then by all means Mike Pelfrey needs to be in a Met uniform. But until that urgency occurs, it may be best for the Mets to allow Pelfrey the time and patience to develop at a slower pace.

Posted in Pitching Staff, Spring Training 2007 | Comments Off on Pelfrey: Resist the Temptation

So Long Soler

Another remnant of the Jim Duquette era was swept out of the Mets organization, as Alay Soler was given his unconditional release.

Strange, it may seem, that the Mets — so desperate for starting pitching — would cut loose Soler, who has shown flashes of brilliance but overall been an enigma.

The conspiracy theorist inside of me believes that Omar Minaya reads MetsToday.com religiously, and acts directly opposite of my evaluations. After all, it is here that the Jose Valentin, Darren Oliver, and Endy Chavez signings were originally bashed; the blog that keeps begging for Aaron Heilman to be put in the starting rotation; the sole site of support for Victor Diaz; the page that gave Chip Ambres 15 minutes of fame; and, most recently, the one place that surmised Alay Soler was ahead of Oliver Perez.

Of course, Minaya has never read MetsToday, and probably never will. More likely, the discrepency between what’s stated here and what actually happens is due to the fact that Minaya and his staff are paid to evaluate baseball talent, while this site is run by some wannabe hack with a keyboard and DSL connection. Nonetheless, I am starting to wonder if my posts have a jinxing effect.

Anywho …

So why did Soler get released? From our perspective — not being on the inside — it’s hard to figure. We can guess that it had something to do with the economics of the situation. If Soler was still with the team beyond March 15th (tomorrow), the Mets would be responsible for paying his entire salary (I think). By releasing him before the official 15th day of spring training, the Mets only have to pay Soler for 30 days’ pay. This bit comes straight from the MLB website:

“March 14th -Last date to request Unconditional Release waivers (By 2:00 p.m. ET) to be secured by March 16th, in order to owe only 30 days termination pay. {Art. IX (B)}”

So it’s probable that the Mets will save themselves a few hundred thousand dollars by cutting him loose. However, the Mets have also kept on Chan Ho Park, Aaron Sele, and Jon Adkins — three guys who have looked more inadequate, are just as costly, and might have less upside.

My guess is that there is more going on than we can know. One thing about Soler that sticks out is his lack of conditioning. Although it’s true he came into camp about 10-15 pounds lighter, it was really too little, too late. While he shed the walrus-like appearance shown at the end of last year, his offseason weight loss merely put him back where was at the beginning of 2006 — which still isn’t good enough. Further, he came in throwing at less than peak velocity. Granted, David Wells can get away with looking like a six-foot-tall beer keg, and not even Billy Wagner is throwing over 90 yet, but Alay Soler could not afford to come into camp at less than peak condition. He was fighting 8-10 other pitchers — most with significant MLB experience — for a spot on the roster. With a salary higher than Aaron Heilman’s, it didn’t make financial sense to keep him around in AAA. For Soler to break the Mets pitching staff — as a starter or reliever — he needed to come into camp in the best shape of his life, already throwing on his own since at least late December / early January. But he didn’t. Perhaps this lack of urgency on his part — or lack of rising to the occasion of the competition in front of him — played a role in the Mets’ decision to drop him.

Personally, I still think he has the talent to pitch somewhere in MLB. No one will be surprised if he resurfaces with the Baltimore Orioles, who 1. are desperate for pitching and 2. have GM Jim Duquette reassembling the 2004 Mets. Although, the Washington Nationals might be a better fit.

Releasing Alay Soler creates a few ripples in Port St. Lucie. First, it shows Jorge Sosa, Chan Ho Park, Aaron Sele, etc., that the Mets are serious about the pitching competition, and not keeping guys around for the sake of keeping them around. No one will be paid to eventually develop or turn around — those competing for a spot need to produce now. Secondly, it gives the competitors more innings to show their wares, and prove their worth. Third, the move gives Rick Peterson more time to work with other “projects”, such as Ambiorix Burgos and Jorge Sosa. Maybe the time the Jacket spent with Soler will be put to better use with Oliver Perez, and Ollie will in turn make strides forward instead of sideways.

Finally, dropping Soler opens a spot on the 40-man roster. There will be other arms (and bats) on the waiver wire, and Omar will be watching. He now has the flexibility to pull the trigger on a mid-March signing or surprise trade. Eventually, that spot could go to, say, Joe Smith — but until then, there’s room to make a move.

It’s still early, but the Mets’ release of Alay Soler sends two messages: 1. everyone is in Port St. Lucie to compete for a job; and 2. the serious competition has begun.

Posted in Pitching Staff, Spring Training 2007 | Comments Off on So Long Soler

Spring Training: Game 9 Notes

Orlando Hernandez made his first preseason appearance since being diagnosed with arthritis, and he looked so-so. Nothing to be concerned about, as his performance was similar to what he showed once every three or four starts in 2006. At times, he is magnificent. Other times, he is a little better than ordinary. And once in a while, he’s nearly awful. This is why counting on El Duque to be a front-end starter is frightening. While there is no question we want him in October, having to endure his rollercoaster performance in the regular season can be maddening. At this point in his career, he’s a #4 or #5 — the best we can expect is a 13-12 season, which is a far cry from a #2 starter on a playoff team.

Getting back to his spring training debut, El Duque looked to be in good shape, and offered his usual assortment of pitches at a thousand different speeds. His curveballs — both normal and slow — had good vertical bite, and he hit 87-88 a few times on the radar gun. The only thing of concern was his tendency to stay too upright on his pitches — possibly due to the neck issue. Though Hernandez doesn’t get too low on his release normally, he also doesn’t throw from the straight-up motion he was exhibiting in the game. On the few occasions he bent his back and got his head down and forward (almost always on curveballs), he made good pitches to good spots low in the zone. The rest of the time, he was hitting the upper half of the strike zone — not good.

On the other hand, Mike Pelfrey was living in the bottom half of the strike zone, continuing to throw hard sinkers for strikes. Still, he was not changing speeds much, and as a result was eventually hit hard. In the end, the numbers looked good, and he had good command. If he ever gets his changeup and slider going, the Mets could have another Brandon Webb.

Jason Vargas continued to impress. He’s a tough little bulldog, reminding me a bit of John Franco as far as the way he carries himself and challenges hitters. Though his fastball can sometimes run too straight, he nonetheless pounds the strike zone and insists that he get beat by getting hit. Almost always working ahead in the count, he mixes in an above-average change-up and fair breaking pitch. He also shows good athleticism and a tenacious, confident attitude. He’s a darkhorse to make the team, but if he keeps throwing fearless strikes, it will be difficult to send him south.

Joe Smith continues to look nasty. He may just sneak into the bullpen.

Ben Johnson also continues to impress. Before, he looked to be a tireless hustler in all phases of the game, with the potential to have some pop. In this latest game, the hustling continued and the potential became reality, as he jerked a three-run homer into the left-field stands. Less than five minutes later, Johnson made a great running catch on a dying quail off the bat of Roger Cedeno. Even without the homer, I’m liking Johnson, and hope he makes the team.

Random Notes

Willie Randolph sent Duaner Sanchez home for being late — his tardiness had become something of a habit over the last few days. We hope this is an issue that can be forgotten, but anyone who was around in the mid- to late-1980s may remember seemingly unimportant reports of Dwight Gooden arriving late to practice and games. Naturally, we’ll assume that Sanchez’s excuse for being late is due to laziness rather than drugs. Unfortunately, there’s that tiny strand of panic forcing awful thoughts into our heads. And assuming it is laziness, kudos to Willie for nipping the issue in the bud and setting Sanchez straight. There are plenty of quality arms fighting for spots (Burgos, Smith, Adkins) in the bullpen, and if Duaner isn’t taking his rehab seriously, there’s someone ready to steal his roster spot. Let’s hope Dirty does an about-face ASAP.

Shawn Green finally got his first hit, thank goodness. While standing on first base, it looked like the weight of the world had slid off his shoulders. (In fact, he was so giddy he stole second base.) Still, during most of the pitches he saw, he looked indecisive and tentative. Cause for concern? I don’t think so. I’m going to go out on a limb and assume that his look of discomfort is due to the fact that he is conscious of making a mechanical change in his swing. Thinking and hitting don’t mix, at least when it comes to mechanics. Hopefully, Green will continue to work hard on fixing his swing in the batting cage, and eventually the change will become unconscious effort in the game. I know that at least 60% of Mets fans are screaming for Milledge to start in RF, and another 35% think Endy Chavez should be starting, but the 5% of us pulling for Green know that, when “right”, Shawn Green can be a monster hitter — the kind that can carry a team. Yes, there’s a good chance that Green’s age has more to do with his demise than a simple mechanical flaw. But, if it really is a glitch, and the glitch can be fixed, the Mets will have the best #7 hitter in baseball history. Granted, in 2002 Jeromy Burnitz was destined to be the greatest #6 hitter ever, and we all know how that turned out.

Chip Ambres was part of the first round of cuts yesterday, which to me was slightly surprising. While Ambres is no star, he was a starting centerfielder in the Major Leagues for a two-month span as recently as 2005. He can play all three outfield positions, has good speed, great attitude, and is a good contact hitter — all assets that would make him an ideal pinch hitter and late-inning defensive replacement. Certainly, he’d be more helpful to the team than, say, Ruben Sierra — who can’t run nor field, yet is getting plenty of opportunities this spring. Ambres’ odds of making the team were huge, but I hoped he’d get a longer look. At this point, it appears he’ll be AAA filler, a good “organizational guy” who is destined for a career as a coach / manager.

Clint Nageotte was also among the first casualties. Too bad, as he looked fairly impressive in his first preseason appearance. We may see him at some point in the season, when / if injuries hit the staff.

Posted in Spring Training 2007 | Comments Off on Spring Training: Game 9 Notes