Reds Trade Willy Taveras
The Reds have sent centerfielder Willy Taveras and infielder Adam Rosales to the Athletics for utilityman Aaron Miles and a PTBNL.
This trade has perked up the ears of some Mets fans and pundits, who are now wondering if it signals an opportunity for the Mets to trade Angel Pagan and a bag of balls to Cincy for Brandon Phillips, Bronson Arroyo, Aaron Harang, and perhaps even Joey Votto.
Such as it goes in that solar system where the planets revolve around Flushing.
In reality, I doubt highly that Taveras’ exodus to Oakland has anything to do with another deal for the supposedly cash-strapped Reds and everything to do with shedding some salary while making room for rookie Drew Stubbs.
The only place where the Mets come into the conversation is to ask why they traded Brian Stokes for Gary Matthews, Jr. if Taveras was available?
Yes, we would have gone ape on the Mets if they acquired Taveras — whose lack of patience at the plate makes Jeff Francoeur look like Rickey Henderson and whose power makes Luis Castillo seem like Barry Bonds. But in comparison to Matthews, Taveras makes more sense — if, of course, we believe the Mets are truly dedicated to building a team around defense and speed.
Offensively, Taveras wouldn’t provide much at all. He’s an over-aggressive singles hitter whose OBP is directly tied to his batting average. In fact his batting is similar to Argenis Reyes, the guy who “always was in the middle of something”. When he does get on base, however, he is a major threat to steal and score. Not only can he fly, but he’s an intelligent baserunner who gets great jumps, gets good reads on line drives, routinely takes the extra base, and rarely suffers from vapor lock or other boneheaded baserunning blunders we are all too familiar with as Mets fans. In fact it wouldn’t be crazy to suggest he’s a better all-around baserunner and basestealer than Jose Reyes.
Defensively, Taveras has few peers. Like his baserunning, he gets good reads and jumps, and makes use of his speed to outrun balls others can’t reach. He makes few errors, hits the cutoff man, throws to the correct base, and even gets a half-dozen assists per year.
Because of his inability to get on base, his salary ($4M) is too high — Matthews at $1.5M is cheap in comparison. But you get what you pay for, right? One other problem with Taveras was he suffered multiple nagging leg injuries last year, so there is the risk that, at 28 years old, he could be slowing down — and without his legs, he has zero value.
Should the Mets have traded for Taveras instead of Matthews? I don’t know, maybe. As mentioned before, we still would’ve killed them for it, but if you really want to connect the Mets and the Reds, Taveras was the most realistic possiblity.
“The Athletics like the flexibility they have added with the acquisition of Adam Rosales from the Reds for Aaron Miles. The A’s were forced to take on the $4 million contract of Willy Taveras and promptly designated him for assignment.”
If he gets released, I’d be in favor of offering him a minor league deal though.
Some may have a difference of opinion, but I’d rather Tavares than Matthews, Jr. In my mind Pagan is more than capable of handling the CF job until Beltran returns – whether that be in May, August, or 2011. So acquiring a 4th/5th OF who could challenge Pagan for the job was not my priority; however, I think that’s the reason the Mets opted to trade for Matthews, Jr. It’s debatable if Matthews still has the skillset to be a starter, especially now playing in the cavernous CitiField. But it’s not debatable that Matthews has had the better career than Tavares, whether it be PED-enhanced or not. And that’s what I believe the Mets are looking at and hoping for – a Matthews resurgence. Excuse me while I remain pessimistic.
Tavares would have been the ideal fit. The areas of the game in which he excels over Matthews are the areas in which the Mets should be concentrating on improving themselves. Like defense, speed, fundamentals, and youth. It would have been hard for the Mets to know that Tavares would have been available for almost nothing back when they made the Matthews trade, but in retrospect it looks like now they could have held on to Stokes, or traded him for something else useful, while plucking Tavares, either from the Reds for a player akin to Aaron Miles (Anderson Hernandez?), or from the A’s for cash. And much like I made the prediction (and have already been proven half right) that Ryan Garko would sign for less and have a better season than Fernando Tatis, I’ll make the same prediction for Willie Tavares and Gary Matthews Jr.
Though, since you started to engage, I will end it here by replying. Congratulations on singlehandedly lowering the collective image of Nationals fans. I for one hope that the entire DC fan base is not represented by your infantile behavior on this blog.
To the rest of you, my suggestion is to ignore personal attacks, as they add nothing to the conversation — and eventually I will delete them.
Feel free to criticize the Mets all you want, but if you have a personal issue with another commenter, “take it outside” and away from this blog. Thanks.