Link Roundup: The Latest on Bourn, Other Activity
According to a tweet by former GM Jim Bowden, if the Mets were able to sign Michael Bourn, it is “likely” the Mets would be able to retain their first round pick.
According to a league source if the Mets were able to sign Michael Bourn it is likely through negotiations w/union pick would be protected
— JIM BOWDEN (@JimBowdenESPNxm) February 7, 2013
Bowden is now an analyst for ESPN and SiriusXM.
If true, this would eliminate one huge roadblock between the Mets and Bourn. The remaining roadblocks would be the length and value of the contract. According to Bowden, who has been a veritable font of knowledge today, Bourn and his camp are looking for $14-15 million per year. The Mets, at this point, are not willing to pay that much, nor are they willing to give him the five years he’s looking for. They’d love a three-year deal, but might settle for four.
The Mets rounded out their bullpen by signing veteran Brandon Lyon. Lyon is 33, and enjoyed a fine 2012 with Houston and Toronto. Combined, he appeared in 67 games, posted a 3.10 ERA, and had the highest SO/9 ratio of his eleven-year career (9.3).
Jon Rauch won’t be joining Lyon in the ‘pen for the Mets this year, but he will remain in the NL East.
The Mets also signed OF Corey Patterson. Remember him? Does “15-2” and “Tom Glavine” ring a bell?
And Terry Collins is planning to start Johan Santana on Opening Day. I’m sure a lot of that is contingent on how he pitches in the Pre-Season.
Finally, GM Sandy Alderson answered questions from fans on Twitter, and as always, Mets tweeps took it very seriously.
But, no reference to Ike Davis, LOOGY?
Seriously, I simply don’t understand how giving 3 or 4 years X $15 million to an OF whose prime years sucked less than the guys we’ve got makes sense. And the notion that he “fixes our leadoff hole” is a mystery: his career OBP is .339 (at age 30, that’s not likely to be ascending), while Rubin Tejada’s 2012 OBP was .333 (at age 21, that is likely to go up). My bet is that, come August, the same fans now screaming that Sandy should sign him will be screaming that Sandy’s an idiot for giving him that contract. After 2 or 3 years, we’ll release him with a year of back ended salary left, and not have those dollars to spend on current talent. And so it goes….
If they sign him, the Mets become a genuine threat to finish…third, instead of fourth. Is that worth it? If it brings more people to Citi in 2013, perhaps. I’m warming to the idea, but I wouldn’t call the move critical to long-term success.
By no means do I see the Mets as favorites, but hear me out. If they are able to acquire Bourn, and take a flier on Brian Wilson, who is there for the taking, I will have a very differnet view of the team. Plenty of ifs, but if Santana is rested and pitches like he did in the first half of 2012, and if Wilson returns to his prior healthy form by the summer, Wheeler and D’Arnaud make noise is AAA, this team can compete. I know everyone is ga ga over the Uptons on the Braves, but that lineup is a K and low OBP waiting to happen They did lose Chipper, Prado, Bourn, and Ross, and McCann may not be healthy. The Mets could well have a better rotation than the Braves. Now, admittedly, the Nats look real good, but who knows, maybe Gio takes a suspension, the pitching takes s step back…at least it gives the Mets and us fans something to root for. Alderson can still do this and keep his beloived payroll under $100 mil without sacfificing the future, if he can get Bourn on his terms.
Your last sentence truly fits the Mets to a “tee.”