Dumping Castillo

It would appear the Mets are in quite a fix if they intend to deal away Luis Castillo. The most recent rumor is that the Diamondbacks have no interest in trading Eric Byrnes for Castillo — and who can blame them?

According to Joel Sherman at the New York Post:

… the Diamondbacks considered shipping diminished righty-hitting outfielder Eric Byrnes (two years left at $22 million) for Castillo, but determined they just don’t like Castillo at all.

Later in the article, Sherman reports:

The Post has learned that the Mets and Royals had discussions in July about swapping expensive malcontent outfielder Jose Guillen for Castillo. An executive who was aware of those talks said he thought it was possible the clubs could revisit negotiations this offseason.

OK, let’s re-read that last sentence and remind ourselves that ANYTHING is possible, so we shouldn’t assume that a Castillo for Guillen deal is something that will definitely be discussed. It’s nice kindling for the hot stove, but in my mind it makes little sense for either team.

First of all, why would the Royals want to take on a bad contract for an overaged second baseman with questionable health? There’s no chance of them “pulling a Tampa Bay” in 2009, and we’d assume they’re looking toward 2010 and beyond — so why bring in a 32-year-old? Wouldn’t a team like KC want to get younger? Then again, Castillo WOULD be younger, considering they played 38-year-old Mark Grudzielanek at the position last year. Which begs the question — why not simply bring back Grudzielanek on a cheap two-year deal? The fans love him, he’s fairly productive, and he seems to enjoy playing in Kansas City. So it’s hard for me to understand why the Royals would be so quick to part with anyone for Luis Castillo.

Now from the Mets’ side of things: why in the world would they want to bring in Jose Guillen? I do realize they need a righthanded, power-hitting corner outfielder — and Guillen certainly fits the bill. But this is the same franchise that felt it necessary to rid themselves of Lastings Milledge mainly because of his attitude and “questionable” character. And it’s the same organization that refused to make a serious play for Manny Ramirez at the deadline for the same character issues. There’s zero truth to the “there wasn’t a match” epithet that Omar Minaya keeps repeating (the Pirates were willing to deal Jason Bay for a package of “touchables”), so the only other thing we can assume is that someone in the hierarchy didn’t want the baggage that came with Manny.

So if a team is unwilling to take on Manny Ramirez for free, why in the world would that same team want to bring in Guillen — who comes with similar baggage plus two more years and who will never have the impact of Ramirez?

If the Byrnes report is true, and if it’s also true that the Royals weren’t interested in parting with Guillen, it may take a miracle to move Luis Castillo. In fact, it probably makes more sense to hold onto him and hope like heck that he can be healthy again. Because I stick to my belief that Castillo on healthy wheels can be productive. Not an All-Star, but productive.

The Mets may have no other choice.

Posted in Shea What? | 3 Comments

Omar Dealing with Brad Pitt?

Finally, the mystery has been revealed as to why Omar Minaya did not make a trade to help push the Mets into the postseason.

He was trying to make a trade with this guy:

Brad Pitt

And you can’t blame Omar for mistaking the famous Hollywood actor Brad Pitt for Oakland Athletics general manager Billy Beane. After all, the two men look strikingly similar — so much so, that in the upcoming movie “Moneyball”, Pitt is playing the role of Beane. (No word yet on who will be playing the roles of Art “Light Up a Room” Howe or Rick Peterson.)

So while Jim Hendry and Pat Gillick were prying away Rich Harden and Joe Blanton from the real Billy Beane, Omar Minaya was discussing a deal for Huston Street over lunch with Beane’s imposter:

Omar Minaya lunching with Brad Pitt

Apparently, this was part of Pitt’s “research” in understanding and performing his upcoming role. According to Pitt:

“I’m a method actor, and the only way to really ‘get’ a character is to step inside his skin — to literally BE that person. I had to walk like Billy Beane, talk like him, dress like him … quite simply, I had to be Beane.”

Major League Baseball should investigate this situation immediately, since Pitt obviously had a hand in altering the outcome of the 2008 season. Had Minaya been speaking with the REAL Billy Beane, perhaps the Mets would have acquired the arms and bats they needed to get to the postseason. Based on the facts, it’s not out of the question to award the Mets with the NL East title, add Huston Street, Justin Duchscherer, and Brad Ziegler to the roster, and and have them play the Phillies in an impromptu 3-game series to decide the true NL champion. Heck, there’s plenty of time to do it, and it will generate a few extra hundred million in lost TV ads.

I implore you Bud Selig: do the right thing.

Posted in 08-09 Offseason, Shea What? | 1 Comment

Chance of Lowe is Low

Ken Rosenthal is reporting that Derek Lowe would prefer to stay on the West Coast, and “…teammates say he has little interest in playing for the Mets or Yankees.”

(Hat tips to ‘Ropolitans and Isuzudude for the link)

Of course, money can change most people’s minds about geography. Everyone has their price.

But, I don’t think the Mets are willing to overpay for Lowe, and doubt they were going to make a big run for him anyway. Lowe might demand a 4-year, $50M deal or larger, and for that kind of dough and term length the Mets might prefer to keep the more youthful Oliver Perez around, or sign the 28-year-old Jon Garland.

As mentioned on MLB Trade Rumors (hat tip to Micalpalyn), the Mets will have a payroll around $110M after arbitration. If they plan to stick to the $138M payroll they operated under in this past year, that means they’ll have about $30M to play with. But that’s a big “if”. For all we know, the Wilpons may want to stay around $120M. Certainly, there’s no reason for them to expand their budget with Citi Field a guarantee to be a profit center regardless of the team’s success or failure. They have at least two years to coast on the “honeymoon effect” of the new ballpark.

We’ve already heard hints that the Mets won’t go after K-Rod, so the highest-priced closer they might sign would be Brian Fuentes, who will probably cost in the $7-10M per year range. It’s a good bet the Mets won’t make a big splash and sign a big-name — i.e., CC Sabathia, Ben Sheets, Mark Teixeira, Manny Ramirez — but instead sign a few a second-level veterans and pick a few projects off the scrap heap.

There’s also the consideration of Perez — at 26, is he worth locking up long term? — and Pedro Martinez. From a performance standpoint, Pedro has been a bust, but behind the scenes, a leader and an unofficial pitching coach. Might the Mets give him an incentive-laden, one-year deal to come back as a fifth starter? If so, then they probably don’t need to sign a Lowe or Perez or any other expensive starter, but make a competition among Jon Niese, Bobby Parnell, and Aaron Heilman for the #4. Niese and Parnell, after all, are the untouchables who couldn’t be included in a deal for innings-eater Joe Blanton, so they must be considered serious candidates for the 2009 team. I threw Heilman into the mix as wishful thinking.

Personally, I do think the Mets need to sign someone as a potential #2 or #3 — be it Ollie, Lowe, Garland, Ryan Dempster, or Brad Penny. But I get the feeling that Perez and/or Garland will be the targets, rather than Lowe.

Posted in 08-09 Offseason, Pitching Staff | 19 Comments

Ambiorix Who?

Ambiorix Burgos arrested

From the above picture, it’s clear that Ambiorix Burgos is NOT a member of the New York Mets but the Chicago White Sox. Whew! that was a close one … the Wilpons should be relieved that Burgos was traded to the Palehose prior to his running and killing two innocent women in his Hummer. What a public relations nightmare THAT would have been!

Oh wait … Ambiorix Burgos is still listed on the Mets’ 40-man roster. Huh. Guess Jay Horwitz has some damage control after all.

So from this picture I see one incredibly disturbing, and three baffling things, in that order:

1. Burgos is smiling. To get caught on camera smiling when you’re being arrested for the murder of two innocent people is NOT good.

2. Why is he wearing a White Sox cap? (Though, thanks for distancing yourself from the Mets, Amby!)

3. Can the Mets give Ramon Castro a raise so he doesn’t have to work as a cop in the offseason?

4. Who is the midget grabbing Amby’s right elbow?

Posted in 08-09 Offseason, Shea What? | 1 Comment

Second Base Timing – Catch 2B2

orlando_hudson.jpgListening to some Mets fans, you’d think Orlando Hudson signed up with the orange and blue two weeks ago. People are already bickering about his best spot in the lineup, and whether Daniel Murphy should continue his second base training in the Arizona Fall League. It’s not unlike the hordes of Yankees fans who already penciled in C.C. Sabathia to the Bronx Bombers’ starting rotation. Unfortunately, the free agent process has yet to begin.

First things first: yes I’d love to see Orlando Hudson as a Met in 2009, and do believe it’s a possibility. However, it’s not a foregone conclusion, and there is a sticky matter to contend with first … or maybe, it’s second.

The issue, of course, is Luis Castillo, who remains on the roster and has three expensive years left on his contract. It’s easy to say “let’s dump him for Eric Byrnes and sign Hudson”, but the reality is more complex. Further, the timing will be tricky.

For example, if you trade Castillo first, that opens up a hole on the roster, and puts the Mets in a poor leveraging position when it comes to free agents such as Hudson — and David Eckstein. Knowing that the Mets don’t have a second baseman for ’09 means their price for one goes up considerably. Sorry, Argenis Reyes will not strike fear into the hearts of savvy agents, and the Dan Murphy experiment is a longshot at best. True, Castillo had a terrible 2008, but he still holds some level of respect outside of Flushing, and as long as he’s around, the Mets don’t NEED a second baseman (except in the opinion of 99.9% Mets fans).

Don’t believe it? Consider last winter, when the Mets had NO CATCHER on their 40-man roster, and very nearly signed Yorvit Torrealba to a contract that would make Castillo’s look like a bargain. Torrealba doesn’t get three years and $15M if the Mets have anyone with a shred of experience and potential in the organization.

Now imagine if Castillo is traded, Murphy is a bust at 2B in the AFL, and Hudson DOESN’T sign — what then? Then, the Mets are really in dire straits, and could be forced into giving someone like Jamey Carroll or Felipe Lopez a Torrealba-like deal. Or they bring in a banged-up, overaged player like Jose Vidro (an Omar Minaya favorite) or Ray Durham (a Jerry Manuel favorite).

So it might behoove the Mets to hold on to Castillo until another second baseman. But then, it will be apparent to everyone in MLB that Castillo is on the block, and it could be impossible to deal him without swallowing most or all of his contract (yes, it IS possible for Castillo to be more difficult to trade than he is right now). If the Mets do indeed sign Orlando Hudson, and have Castillo still hanging around, opposing GMs will laugh heartily at any and all offers Minaya puts on the table.

I’m not sure which way works best — and not convinced a move of Castillo will be made at all. If he is still on the team come spring training, I won’t be surprised to see either of the aforementioned Vidro or Durham also brought in as motivation. Vidro can play some first base, and Durham is better suited to left field at this point of his career, so either would fit in nicely even if they don’t win the starting second base job.

Should be interesting to see how this turns out.

Posted in 08-09 Offseason | 1 Comment

Aaron Heilman: Most Abused Pitcher in Baseball?

Was Aaron Heilman the most abused pitcher in baseball in 2008? Look at the numbers and judge for yourself. His 1486 pitches thrown were tied for the second-most in MLB among “pure” relievers — pitchers who did not make any starts. (Carlos Marmol led all relievers in pitches with 1505 – but we’ll get to him).

Tampa Bay’s J.P. Howell also threw exactly 1486 relief pitches in 2008 — yet he pitched consistently well throughout the year, and enjoyed a strong September, while Heilman finished the season in the doghouse, appearing in only 7 games. What was the difference?

First of all, Howell never appeared in more than 11 games in any one month — Rays manager Joe Maddon used Howell (and all his relievers) judiciously. Howell appeared in 8 games in April, 11 games in May, June, July, and September, and 12 games in August. Interestingly, his pitch counts were fairly high in the first two months of the season — 275 in April, 294 in May, and 280 in June — but Maddon tapered down his pitches in July (185) and August (210), ensuring he’d be strong enough in September (235 pitches).

Compare that to the “management” of Heilman:

[TABLE=37]

Heilman was essentially pushed to the upper limits in April — you can blame Randolph for that — and he may never have recovered. To Randolph’s credit, he did back off on using Heilman in May and was limiting his pitches in June. However, once Manuel took over, it was right back to abuse, appearing 16 times in July and 15 times in August.

Also of note in the Howell — Heilman comparison is days’ rest. Howell was used on zero days rest 13 times all season; Heilman, twice as many (26). Howell was most frequently used on one days’ rest (19 times), followed by two days’ rest (16) and three days’ (9). In contrast, Heilman appeared with one days’ rest 21 times, on two days 18 times, and on three days’ 11 times. It should also be noted that Heilman once pitched in both ends of a doubleheader.

Appearances on Days’ Rest: JP Howell vs. Aaron Heilman

[TABLE=38]

* including two ends of one DH

Finally, Aaron Heilman threw 26 or more pitches in an outing 18 times, including two instances in which he threw 51 pitches or more. Howell threw 26+ in a game 21 times, but never more than 50, and clearly was given more rest.

Of particular consideration is the fact that Aaron Heilman was slated to be a setup man or 7th inning middle reliever. As a result, he was conditioned for this role from the beginning of spring training. As such, we can presume that preseason preparation program was optimized for him to pitch one inning at a time, 2-3 times per week. The sum total of his acutal workload in the season, however, was more comparable to that of a long reliever / spot starter. In fact, the only relievers in 2008 who threw more pitches than Heilman, Howell, and Marmol were those who made at least a few starts, and who were used almost exclusively in long relief roles: Chan Ho Park, Hong Chih Kuo, Boof Bonser, and Carlos Villanueva.

But then what about Marmol, who threw 19 more pitches than Heilman and had perhaps the best season of any setup man / middle reliever in baseball?

Let’s look at Lou Piniella’s use of Marmol (which could also be termed “abuse”):

[TABLE=39]

While it could be argued that Marmol was abused more than Heilman, it should be noted that Marmol’s highest pitch count in any one month was 293, and second-highest was 277. Heilman had highs of 308, 299, and 293 – again, these are numbers more comparable to long relievers. Still, it would seem that Marmol was at the very least the second-most abused pitcher in MLB next to Heilman, based on his frequency of use.

Marmol’s use in regard to days’ rest is similarly disturbing:

[TABLE=40]

Unlike Heilman, however, Marmol was never used in both ends of a doubleheader. He threw more than 26 pitches in an outing 17 times (compared to Heilman’s 16), but never more than 51 (Heilman did it twice).

Also of concern is the fact that both Marmol and Heilman rely heavily on a mid-90s fastball; in contrast, Howell is a “soft tosser” who barely tops out at 90 MPH. Generally speaking, throwing at a higher velocity takes more toll on a pitcher’s body.

It has to be understood that these numbers reflect the most abused pitchers in all of MLB — the vast majority of middle relievers are used 10-12 times per month, 160-220 pitches per month. Total pitches for the year for a typical middle reliever is anywhere from 650-1100.

This post is an excerpt from an upcoming report in progress titled “Bullpen Blueprint”, which examines and compares the bullpens of successful MLB teams in 2008. The full report will be available for PDF download at MetsToday.com when it is complete.

Posted in Bullpen Blueprint | 6 Comments

Bullpen Blueprint – Teasers Coming

Last week I began researching an article about the management (and mismanagement) of big league bullpens in 2008. However, what began as an article turned into a treatise — the document is currently over 20 pages long (and growing) and certainly too hefty for a blog post. Eventually, it will be available as a PDF download.

Basically, what I’ve done is researched each playoff team’s bullpen management, as far as the frequency of use, pitch counts, and rest time, to determine whether there is a pattern among successful teams. Actual performance — that is, ERAs, blown saves, etc. — were not a focus of the study, though included for comparison. This may seem illogical, but the point of my research was to find out what successful teams do in their attempt to keep their bullpens fresh and performing at optimum levels from games one through 162.

Since we already know that teams strictly manage their starting pitchers — stopping them when they reach specific pitch counts, and ensuring they regularly receive at least four days’ rest between starts — I was curious to find out if teams also exerted similar limitations for their bullpen arms. What I’m finding out is that they do — or at least, the numbers suggest they do. This may seem obvious to most baseball fans, but as Mets fans, we certainly haven’t seen any patterns or “rules” in regard to handling relievers in the last 3-4 years.

MetsToday readers know I’m not much for grinding out and quoting statistics, and this report won’t be of interest to the number-crunching sabermetricians. But I’m hoping it sheds light on the correct and safe ways to manage championship bullpens — or at least begins the conversation. Because I don’t believe there’s any “mystery” or “luck” dictating middle relief performance from one year to the next, and I do think that there IS a right and wrong way to handle a bullpen over the course of a season. What I’m theorizing is that most studies are flawed in that they have focused on the raw performance numbers (ERA, WHIP, etc.) of relievers rather than taking a step back and seeing whether a reliever (or bullpen) has been properly prepared to compete.

This afternoon I’ll publish a “teaser” or excerpt titled, “Aaron Heilman: Most Abused Pitcher in Baseball?”. I’ll continue to post excerpts over the next two weeks, if you’re interested to read this doctrine as it develops. Your comments are more than welcome.

Posted in Bullpen Blueprint | Comments Off on Bullpen Blueprint – Teasers Coming

Manuel’s Coaching Staff

Supposedly, non-interim Mets manager Jerry Manuel will have a say in his coaching staff — a luxury not granted his predecessor Willie Randolph. But will he REALLY be able to choose his own staff? And if indeed he does, will it be much different from the one that was in place in game 162?

Hitting Coach Howard Johnson certainly should be back — his work getting Carlos Delgado back on track is evidence enough of his value. I really hate to play down Jerry Manuel’s role in motivating Delgado, but the fact of the matter is, it was HoJo who identified the flaws in Delgado’s swing, and worked with him to get them corrected. Johnson has also been credited for David Wright’s success — and Wright has been the Mets’ most consistent hitter over the past two years. If Johnson is not brought back, I’d imagine he’d quickly get a similar job elsewhere.

Pitching coach Dan Warthen does not have the public cache of Rick Peterson, but is well respected throughout organized baseball as a man under whom young pitchers can reach their potential. In fact it was right here at MetsToday that we suggested Warthen’s signing last February was the second-best acquisition of 2008. As it turned out, Warthen was credited with the turnaround of Oliver Perez and the development of Mike Pelfrey. Is that enough to earn a return to the big-league stage, considering that untouchables Jonathan Niese and Bobby Parnell are expected to vie for spots in ’09? Hard to say, but if he’s not retained, one would hope he’d be offered a job somewhere in the organization, to continue working his magic with young hurlers.

Bullpen coach Guy Conti could be on the way out, since the main reason he was with the Mets was because Pedro Martinez specifically asked for him to join the organization. Which is too bad, because inside sources reveal that Conti — and not Peterson — was the driving force behind many of the successful Mets pitchers. In addition to his tie to Pedro, Conti is unfortunately tied to the bullpen, which is getting the bulk of the blame for the Mets’ disappointing finish. The “correct” public move would be to make Conti the fall guy.

First base coach Ken Oberkfell could also get the heave-ho, which is another unfortunate situation. Oberkfell has proved himself as a manager at nearly every level in the minors, biding his time for an MLB opportunity. But Manuel’s wizardry kept him from an opportunity with the Mets, and as a result he may be better off moving on to an organization with which he has a better chance of managing. How Manuel deals with Oberkfell, in particular, should be interesting. Will he keep Obie around, for his baseball knowledge and reputation for fundamentals, or is Obie’s status as “manager in waiting” be too threatening? Remember that Manuel filled that role under Randolph.

Sandy Alomar says he wants to come back. Does anyone care? Hey I like Sandy as much as the next guy, but he — like Manuel and HoJo and Conti — has been around for two consecutive collapses. Is he so vital that he can escape a housecleaning — especially considering his strong ties to Willie Randolph, and the Randolph regime? One thing is fairly certain — he’ not a threat to Manuel. Plus he’s a worldly baseball man, and people like him (including me).

Sandy Alomar, Jr., is a nice guy, too — and we assume he had something to do with the great job done by Mets catchers in 2008. If he doesn’t come back at the MLB level, I’d think the team has a position for him elsewhere in the organization (i.e., Francisco Pena’s personal tutor).

I think it’s safe to say Luis Aguayo will be gone. I didn’t quite understand his hiring to begin with (favor to someone?) and Jerry has been lukewarm and non-committal when asked about the third base coach.

By the way, Jerry Manuel has made a public statement regarding his goal to stress fundamentals with the ’09 club. That’s very nice … where have I heard that before? Oh yeah, Willie Randolph made similar proclamations in the past. Hopefully this won’t be another idea passed on from Willie that goes by the wayside (or have we forgotten “resting the regulars”, “establishing bullpen roles”, etc.?).

As for coaches to bring in, it’s too early to guess, as the current coaches need to be decided first, and who knows who might be available? But, if HoJo is not retained, I’d think it would be because Rudy Jaramillo was coming in — or if Jerry’s really getting his way, we may see Gary Ward. Gary Pettis is also a possibility to be, say, a first base coach; Pettis was a coach with the Mets during the Art Howe years and also worked under Manuel in Chicago.

The main issue to address, in my mind, is what to do regarding the pitching coach. If the Mets don’t bring Warthen back, who is out there to bring in? There doesn’t appear to be anyone currently in the organization who would be considered (unless I’m missing someone?). Will Manuel have the opportunity to hire one of “his” guys, and if so, who might that be? Otherwise, is there someone special that the Mets might go after? For example, Leo Mazzone or Chuck Hernandez?

Posted in 08-09 Offseason | Comments Off on Manuel’s Coaching Staff