Mets at the Movies

Tomorrow (Wednesday, May 21st), you can watch the Mets vs. Braves on big screen … REALLY big screen.

The game will be presented in high definition at three Clearview Cinema movie theater locations: Chelsea Cinemas (Manhattan), Parsippany Cinemas (New Jersey), and Port Washington Cinemas (Long Island). Tickets are $12 and are on sale now at (718) 507-TIXX or visit Mets.com/movies.

Fans in attendance will participate in traditional Shea Stadium in-game activities including t-shirt launches, lucky fan giveaways, and other Shea favorites recreating the Mets ballpark experience … minus the sausage sandwiches and beer. Supposedly, Mr. Met will be there as well, but I’m not sure how he’s getting to all three locations in the same evening (unless they have two fakes?).

The Mets will hold two more “Mets at the Movies” events on July 17 and August 27, though the locations have yet to be determined.

Posted in News Notes Rumors | Comments Off on Mets at the Movies

Mets Game 41: Win Over Yankees

Mets 11 Yankees 2

The Mets scored, then they scored, and then they scored some more, in spanking the last-place Yankees (gawd I loved typing that).

Yes I hate interleague play and this Mets-Yankees thing is getting old, but I do enjoy watching the Yanks get spanked by the orange and blue. That 2000 World Series still stings.

The Mets jumped on ace Chien-Ming Wang for four runs in the fourth, but it should have been six. Carlos Delgado hit the cheapest homerun of his career to make it six-nothing Mets, but the third base umpire changed his mind and called the fair ball foul. Eventually, Delgado singled in a run to make the score four-zip, but there is a BIG difference between a 4-0 lead and 6-0 lead; the latter demoralizes a team, the former lets them think they still have a chance.

The score means a lot in baseball, which as Yogi Berra once eloquently stated, is at least 70% half-mental. Baseball is all about momentum, and when you can score six runs in one inning against the other team’s ace, your opponent tends to bury its head in its hands and go through the motions the rest of the game.

And as it turned out, Delgado’s lost tater didn’t matter, because the Mets exploded for another six runs in the eighth to put the game out of reach.

Lost in all the offensive excitement was the dominating performance by Oliver Perez. O’Pea allowed only three hits and two runs in 7 2/3 innings in shutting down the A-Rodless Yanks. He was totally focused on the mound, brimming with confidence, and showing similar body language to his 2006 postseason appearances. Now if only he can turn that “on” more often, he’d be on the top level of NL lefthanders.

Notes

Willie Randolph should have gotten himself thrown out of the game when Delgado’s homerun was overturned — it would have been an ideal time to erase his image as too-calm guy who doesn’t fight for his players. He was steamed, for sure, but not steamed enough to get tossed. Just once he should lose his mind, get ejected, and quiet the critics — the Bronx was the perfect place. Instead, bench coach Jerry Manuel was thrown out of the game. Believe me when I tell you I don’t think a manager has to get thrown out of games to be effective — but right now, Randolph’s future is tied directly to public perception. So, if he needs to get tossed to appease the fans, the pundits, the talkradio morons, and thereby save his job … well, pull an Earl Weaver, will ya?

Ryan Church hit an absolute bomb in the sixth, depositing a ball into the “batter’s eye” (a.k.a., the “fake” bleachers in centerfield). The blast was reminiscent of Reggie Jackson’s fifth homer of the 1977 World Series (and third straight of Game Six) hit off Charlie Hough. I bring up Reggie Jax because he turned 62 on Sunday.

Yankee Stadium was loud as heck after Reyes deposited the ball into the right field bleachers. Nice.

Next Game

The makeup game won’t happen on Monday because a) MLB won’t make enough money on the two NYC teams with a spur-of-the-moment Monday night game; and b) the Mets have a double-dip on Tuesday in Atlanta. So, Monday remains an off day, and on Tuesday we’ll see John Maine face Tom “Undevastated” Glavine at 1:05 pm, and Claudio Vargas vs. Jorge Campillo in the nightcap at 7:05 pm.

Posted in Mets 2008 Games | 14 Comments

Mets Game 40: Win Over Yankees

Mets 7 Yankees 4

Johan Santana allowed four earned runs, but was in complete control of the game and pitched into the eighth inning in leading the Mets to a much-needed win over the crosstown Yankees.

Both David Wright and Carlos Beltran had 3-for-5 days, scoring four runs between them, and both Wright and Jose Reyes sent balls over the wall to propel the offense.

The Mets were stymied by starter Andy Pettitte the first time through the lineup, but got to him the second time around, scoring three runs in the fourth to go ahead for good.

Billy Wagner made a rare 8th inning entry to rescue Johan, then struggled a bit in the ninth before notching his ninth save of the season.

Notes

Carlos Beltran slammed his third triple of the year in the eighth off Joba Chamberlain. He eventually scored on a rare two-out RBI single by Carlos Delgado.

Until that single, Oldgado was looking awful, striking out twice and popping up weakly. Though he did sneak in another single at some point in the game … I must have missed it.

Next Game

The final game of the series will be played tomorrow night at Yankee Stadium at 8pm. Oliver Perez goes against Chien-Ming Wang. Unfortunately, the game will be carried on FOX (oops, I meant ESPN … almost as bad). You can also catch it on WFAN and XM 186. Kind of strange the Mets aren’t giving John Maine the start, but oh well.

Posted in Mets 2008 Games | 6 Comments

Watch: Playing For Peanuts #2

peanuts.jpgA reminder to you, since no one else seems interested in letting you know: the second episode of Playing for Peanuts will be airing on Sunday at 6pm on SNY.

If you are unable to watch the show live, be sure to set your Tivo or DVR to record it. This is one of the few worthwhile pieces of baseball content on the tube in a long time (no offense to “Beer Money” nor “Loudmouths”, of course).

In addition, I urge you to watch this series with an open mind, and make your own judgments about Wally Backman, rather than accept the four-year-old nonsense that has been regurgitated by the headline chasers. Further, it doesn’t matter whether you like Wally, think he’s nuts, or never heard of him — this series was built for serious baseball fans interested in learning about the human side of minor leaguers.

More information can be found on the Playing for Peanuts website.

Oh, and to give you a teaser … this Sunday you’ll find out how a blackout, bottle rockets, a lobster claw, and karaoke can combine to tell a story.

Posted in News Notes Rumors | Comments Off on Watch: Playing For Peanuts #2

Subway Series: Part 5 (Final)

Who is Edwar Ramirez and why doesn’t he have a “d” at the end of his first name? Seriously, he looks pretty nasty so far … might he be an answer in the late innings?

He’s got a nice change up, but he was up and down last year. And right now, the end of the game is the least of the Yankees concern. Ohlendorf has pitched well, and hell, even Cooter Farmadooke hasn’t been the frustrating meathead that he usually is. Of course, Chamberlain is tough and then there is the great Mariano. My friend Steve Goldman recently said that watching Mariano these days must have been like what watching Fred Astaire was like at the end of his career. He’s still so graceful, his delivery so smooth and seemingly effortless. I don’t know if there is another player that makes me appreciate the moment more than Rivera. I feel so fortunate to have watched him all these years. You know the old saying about how the great ones are more than just their numbers? I really get that feeling with Rivera, who has two gut-wrenching playoff loses to his name, but still he’s been so great for so long. And getting back to the numbers, here is one that still gets me excited: 0.77 ERA in 117 career post season innings. Amazing.

Any other “unknowns” to watch for this weekend?

I’d expect the Mets to take two of three, especially with Santana pitching. Cano had four hits tonight, maybe he’s starting to hit. But without Rodriguez and Posada, lefties really give them trouble. And right now, they are offensively…challenged.

Finally, how do you feel about this annual Subway Series? Is it me or is this thing getting a little tired?

I haven’t really enjoyed the subway serious in a long time. I know MLB wants to maximize the moolah, but if there has to be interleague play I’d have the Yanks and Mets play one, three-game series each year, taking turns, one year in the Bronx, the next in Queens. That might give the match-up a little more urgency. Otherwise, I think it’s just hype. I’d rather the Yankees face the Indians or the Angels more than some random NL teams–they are playing the Reds this summer…okay…The series is really for the fans, and I suppose heads still get amped for it, still turn out and enjoy the bragging rights. But there is nothing special about the subway series. It’d be special if it happened in the World Serious. Otherwise, it’s just another series, with a lot of racket around it.

Subway “serious” and “World Serious” … loving that … those who are avid readers of Ring Lardner should appreciate that one. Here’s to hoping Alex is right about the weekend, especially that part abou the Mets taking two out of three.

Thanks again to Alex Belth for giving us a full day’s worth of opinion from the Yankees fan’s perspective. Be sure to check out Bronx Banter, Alex’s columns on Sports Illustrated, and his excellent book on Curt Flood.

Posted in Series Previews | 2 Comments

Subway Series: Part 4

I know you’ve been a fan of the Yanks since the 1970s, so surely you have a place in your heart for Willie Randolph. Unfortunately, the Mets fans and pundits are calling for his head after every loss … it’s getting awful. I rarely stick my head out of my Mets vacuum, so don’t know if that’s the case with Girardi. Is there a lot of noise about firing him, or that the Yankees made a mistake in offending Joe Torre (or not hiring Don Mattingly)?

If so, here’s an idea: How about we trade managers, since most fans complain that Willie doesn’t play small ball, doesn’t motivate the players, doesn’t get fired up enough, doesn’t argue with umps, doesn’t get thrown out of games, doesn’t handle the pitching staff properly, and his “Torre style” of managing doesn’t work in the NL. (I don’t necessarily agree with all these complaints) Knowing the public perception of Girardi, you’d think he’d be perfect for the “Fire Willie” camp. And perhaps getting a Torre disciple would ease the fans in the Bronx?

I haven’t paid close enough attention to how Randolph manages to have an opinion one way or the other about him as a field general, but the manager usually gets the brunt of the blame when his team underachieves. So far as I can tell, Girardi hasn’t gotten much grief in the BX. He’s strange. I knew he was uptight which is a perfect fit for the Yankees. But I’ve been surprised at how secretive he’s been at times with the media re: player injuries. Almost to the point of being paranoid. Since he played and coached for Torre, worked for YES and FOX, I didn’t expect that from him. Michael Kay has said that Girardi reminds him of Billy Martin in that he takes losses very hard. You can see him, pale and drained after a loss. I think he’s equal parts Buck Showalter and Bill Virdon.

It’ll be interesting to see how it pans out for him. My contention all along is that you wouldn’t want to be the guy who replaces Joe Torre, you want to be the guy who replaces the guy who replaces Torre. Still, for a guy following Torre, I think Girardi is fine. He’s not beloved in the way that Mattingly is, but I think he can take what comes–success or failure–and survive it as well as anyone in his position could.

As for manager-swapping, I’d just assume keep Girardi over Randolph. And I think Met fans would embrace ANYONE who got his team winning. They’ll throw bouquets at Randolph’s feet too, although I fear that anything short of a championship would be considered a disapointment for Randolph at this point. I could be wrong about that. What’d your take?

Wait, I’m still trying to get over the combination of Bill Virdon and Buck Showalter — the vision of that gives me the willies (pardon the pun).

You’re dead on about two things: first, the Mets fans would embrace anyone who happens to be manager when the team wins. And second, Willie will be considered a failure if the Mets do anything other than get to the World Series. I don’t think they’ll blame him if he loses the WS, but if he doesn’t get there, everyone will expect him to be fired. And that’s a difficult expectation for any manager.

What bothers me is that many Mets fans seem to me to be more like traditional Yankees fans — in that they expect the team to finish first and make a World Series appearance. I suppose some of it has to do with the expectations set by the Wilpons, and their commitment to building a winning ballclub (i.e., signings of Pedro, Beltran, trade for Johan, etc.). But historically, the New Yorkers who were Mets fans were the people who were, well, “anti-Yankee” fans. In other words, the opposite of the Yankees fans. Being a Mets fan meant you pulled for the underdog, and had little expectations, and cheered for your team through good times and bad. But that seems to have changed, and I suppose it’s a natural progression when your team starts dishing out nine-figure contracts.

Naturally, I’d like to see the Mets in the Fall Classic again someday, and was frustrated by their underachievement last year. But the more Willie gets blamed, the more I find myself pulling for him. It’s as if he’s embodied the traditional Mets — an underdog, with seemingly no chance to win. That said, though I proposed the Randolph-for-Girardi trade, and believe a strong personality like Girardi is what many are clamoring for, the sentimental side of me wants to see Willie come out of this a winner. The logical side, though, is starting to lose confidence in Mr. Randolph.

OK, I’m finished … in the next installment, we finally discuss the series at hand. In particular, Alex will educate us on the Yankees bullpen, who stole the “d” at the end of Edwar Ramirez’s name, and which team he predicts will win the series (you may be surprised). Check back in a little while ….

Posted in Series Previews | Comments Off on Subway Series: Part 4

Subway Series: Part 3

Seeing how Phil Hughes and Ian Kennedy have been struggling, would you do the Philip Hughes / Ian Kennedy / Melky Cabrera for Johan Santana deal today? Why or why not?

I was hoping the Yanks made that deal over the winter although many Yankee fans I know–including my co-host at Bronx Banter Cliff and many of our readers–were dead set against giving up Hughes and IPK for Santana. Considering how Hughes and Kennedy have done this year, it’s easy to say the Yanks should have made the deal, but it’s way to early to make that call yet. Will probably be a few years before we have any sense of how it turned out. Again, though I was for the trade, I can’t fault the Yankees’ thinking–going with their youngsters. Also, they would have had to shell out so much dough on top of losing the kids. So nah, I don’t look back with regret. Hell, the signing the Yanks never made that really came back to haunt them was not inking Carlos Beltran, who would have been ideal to replace Bernie Williams. Instead, they forked over big bucks for Tony Womack, Jaret Wright and Carl Pavano. That one still smarts.

Tampa Bay is in first, the Yankees are about to replace the Blue Jays in the cellar, and Carlos Quentin is leading the AL in homers. In other words, it’s mid-May of any given baseball season. Are there any realistic concerns from the Yankees fans’ perspective right now, or are most chalking it up to the traditional slow start?

Although the Yanks have been worse to begin the season in recent years, I think this team is in worse condition. They really feel like a team in transition, and although I’m sure they will recover some, they’ve got a bunch of guys getting old fast–Damon, Giambi, Mussina, even Matsui and Abreu to come extent. Course they are the most expensive transition team in history. LOL. They don’t have a lot of bats that scare you without Jorge and Alex Rodriguez in the line up do they? I don’t think they’ll make the post-season this year, and while I’m sure I’ll be pulling my hair out come September, the thought of it doesn’t bother me as much as it would have in years past. Also, the way the baseball fates work, it would just seem to make sense that in the final year of Yankee Stadium, the team’s October run would come to an end. It might not be fitting for us Yankee fans, or for the Yankees and MLB, but I think that’s the way it’s gunna turn out.

There’s still more to come … in the next part of our series, I offer Alex a trade: Willie Randolph for Joe Girardi. Get a cup of coffee and check back here in a bit to see if he takes the bait …

Posted in Series Previews | Comments Off on Subway Series: Part 3

Subway Series: Part 2

In part 2 of our Q & A with Alex Belth of Bronx Banter, Alex gives us his view of the impatient fans of the northeast.

Alex, not sure if you’ve heard, but this year Shea Stadium has an unprecedented amount of boo-birds. We kid around here in the “Metsosphere” that the people booing are actually converted Yankee fans … but tell me, would Yankee fans boo Johan Santana on Opening Day? Would they be riding Aaron Heilman as hard as the Sheasters are lately?

I’ve noticed that Met fans get impatient and testy sooner than Yankee fans when I’ve been at the ballpark because there is a sense of the other shoe dropping with the Mets. It is as if some Met fans are just waiting for something bad to happen so they cut it off at the pass by cursing their team at the drop of a hat. It’s a by-product of many losing seasons and a handful of heartbreakers thrown too. On the other hand, so many Yankee fans, particularly younger ones, feel entitled and will accept nothing less than total and complete victory. Let’s face it, Yankee fans are spoiled, by the team’s success throughout MLB history, and by therecent championship run. And that sense of entitlement has long been fostered by George Steinbrenner. It’s understandable but unfortunate, particularly because I think those late 90s Yankees, almost to a man, appreciated how hard it is to win and how improbable what they accomplished actually was.

Would Yankee fans be booing Heilman right now? You bet they would. Would they have booed Santana on Opening Day? It’s certainly not out of the realm of possibility. You’d think a guy would get a little slack but if Hughes pitched a shut out on Opening Day for the Twins (had he been traded), and Santana got rocked, sure he’d likely hear some boos in the Bronx. Then again, Met fans are understandably sore over what happened last year, nevermind the heartbreak of Yadir Molina the year before.
The bottom line is that both Met fans and Yankee fans are New Yorkers, so they do share a lot in common. I’m sure that statement will offend a lot of people who are convinced that there are very specific and clear differences between the two fan bases, just like Red Sox fans take offense when I’ve suggested that the Sox and Yanks have more in common than not. Throw Philly fans in there too. Yes, there are differences between the fan bases, but they are all from the northeast, are all self-absorbed, are all impatient and not shy about expressing their feelings.

In the next installment, Alex tells us whether he’d do the Johan Santana trade today, and why he believes the last season in Yankee Stadium could be unpleasant for Yankee fans …

Posted in Series Previews | Comments Off on Subway Series: Part 2